"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:37:19 -0400, D wrote:

Don White wrote:
"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be
the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.



Dummy, Mexico is a haven for companies that have production that doesn't
meet US EPA standards.

Don, it's very hard to believe you are calling someone else a dummy.

If we were to lead the way, then we should be building nuclear
reactors as fast as we can.

Wake up. Get back on the tit.
--
John H


Hee hee...Johnny, Johnny...looks like it's your dis-able seaman Dingy Dan
calling the names.
Now who's the dummy?