"John H." wrote in message
...
Not really. I'm making a direct comparison, which is certainly a
reasonable
thing to do.

Claiming it's Bush Rationale isn't much of a logical argument, since it
can
be interpreted many different ways.

Justifying Obama's actions by comparing to Bush's actions is making
use of the 'Bush Rationale'.

Don't feel bad. You're in great company. Harry approves.


I can't speak for other people, but I'm not justifying any actions. I'm
making a direct comparison. At the end of 8 (I'm hopeful) years, we can
compare the records more completely. For now, there are some obvious
comparisons possible.

--
Nom=de=Plume