On Sep 14, 12:51*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

...







"H the K" wrote in message
om...
Calif Bill wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:59:56 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. *I wonder why that is.
Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much more.
I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many
think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about
future
terrorism. *We are all so safe now that terrorism has been removed
from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the
country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the
right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
You are correct. That's another thing I can add to the list of great
Obama accomplishments.
Yup, it's great that Bush spent 8 years softening them up snerk

--
Wafa free since 2009

Yeah, murdering people. Lots of people. One of Bush's accomplishments
in your mind anyway.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Just continuing in the footsteps of his predecessor.

Bush killed at least 100,000 people. He also allowed 3000+ U.S. civilians
to be killed.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

And Clinton was killing people in Irag, Bosnia, and allowed Ben Ladin to
walk, so he could plan and train the pilots on his watch. *They both suck.
They suck as much as you suck and that is a whole bunch of suck.

Allowed bin Laden to walk? How's that? He tried to get him several times.


not only that, but every time clinton did something, the GOP
complained it was 'political'. if he'd killed bin laden the GOP
would have impeached him