On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:36:52 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:19:53 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:40:04 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:42:51 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Frankly, I honestly don't care either. However, again to be fair and
balanced, the media and the Left made a big deal about President
Bush's golf outings during times of economic stress and two wars. So
why aren't they making the same comparision for President Obama who
has, as of today, made more golf outings in the first nine months of
his Administration than Bush did in three years of his administration
under the same conditions?

Do you really think it's fair to compare Obama with some idiot who gave
up golf "in solidarity" with dying soldiers?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...le/2008/05/13/
AR2008051302783.html

Yes I do. He gave it up direcly because of the criticism.

Call it what you will. I don't care one way or the other as I said.

What's fair is fair.

Well, to be fair then, I can't find anyone "making a big deal" of Bush's
golfing. I do remember the press making a big deal about Bush playing
guitar while New Orleans flooded. It also seems a little silly to be
comparing golf outings of someone who does golf, with someone who gave it
up, for whatever reason.

How about brush clearing? I'm sure Bush has spent much more time
clearing brush than Obama has.

How about basketball games in the middle of the day? "Date" nights.

The problem is that the liberal media, and most liberals, can't live
by their own rules. As Saul Alinsky said: "Make the enemy live up to
their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no
more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to
Christianity.:

Fair is fair. :)