BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Tosk

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:02:03 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 6, 9:32*am, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:47:43 -0500, Tosk

wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:19:51 -0600, thunder
wrote:

One of the problems with Yucca Mountain, it's 30 year old technology. *
The proposed Generation IV reactors produce much less waste, and with
reprocessing may make the whole concept of a nuclear waste repository,
such as Yucca Mountain, unnecessary. *It's my understanding that Yucca
Mountain hasn't been permanently discared, but they are having a blue-
ribbon panel look at it with modern day eyes. *There may very well be,
cheaper, safer, ways to accomplish it's mission.

It's sure nice to see a liberal who puts some thought into a topic.

I agree with this post and would add, is intellectually honest if not
wrong sometimes

And I concur with that also. Intellectual honesty seems quite rare in
that side of the aisle, but it does exist in this case.
--
John H

Do you mean like "death panels"

Or, At the behest of the oil and coal barons, Republican propagandists
first attacked the bill as an "energy tax" that would force American
consumers into abject poverty. They referred to an independent and
reputable study by scientists at MIT in their initial attacks, but a
co-author of the study told Congress that they were distorting and
misrepresenting its findings.
snipped

An ability to cut'n'paste does not exhibit intellectual honest. If it
did, Harry would win the prize.

But Harry "edits" them, so the reasoning still stands...

--
Wafa free again.