On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:44:43 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
om...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
Some for sure... can't be helped really. Not nearly as much as Bush
wasted in his administration.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Youe opinion. But all Obama's spending has not turned around the
recession. Percentage of unemployment still rising, and that excludes
those that have given up on getting a job. The stock market is mostly a
bubble driven by all the money given to "too big to fail" financial
houses. Which have now decided to give billions of bonus money, even
though they have not really made any money, just a huge infusion of
taxpayers $$$$$$$$. We have the next wave of mortages going to fail.
The not subprime ones. The bailout was to supposed to buy toxic
mortgages. None bought, so what did the banks do with the money. Gold
broke $1100. Most of the rise is the falling dollar. What happens when
China wants to cash in all that debt we owe them.

Bush's tax cut for the wealthy is my opinion????

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bushes tax cut was across the board. The tax cuts he put in place, made
it that 40% of the people do not pay income tax.

Right. If you believe that, there's not much I can help you with...

Bill's smarter than Warren Buffet. That's why they recently tapped
Bill to run Berkshire Hathaway.

When the tax cuts were being debated, Warren said that Bush should
give $1,000 to a million taxpayers who earn less than (I think it was
$100K). He made the point that they'd immediately turn around and put
the money back in circulation purchasing hard goods like washers,
fridges, cars. Things they needed.

Saying further that if the money is given to the top 2%, they'd just
throw it in the bank or someplace that'd have no effect on the
economy.

That's a smart man. Bush and his advisors didn't care.

Neither did Bill.