"John H" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:20:56 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it
a baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business
in my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange idea.

Are we talking about someone beating a child? No. But, nice diversion
from
the fact that you won't be nor have you given birth.

As I said, you have no business telling a woman what to do.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I guess I can not tell her to stop beating her kids. As I have no
business
telling a women what to do with her life or her property. That about it?


You do realize that although you're getting a charge out of making the
plum look like a dip****, you're also making us wade through her
vacuous comments.


For which I'm grateful. Keep up the good work Bill!!

--
Nom=de=Plume