I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:39:12 -0500, Jim wrote:
The lady had to lay off the teachers she couldn't afford to pay. If she
couldn't get more money budgeted to avoid the layoff, what other options
did she have?
I'm fairly familiar with situations like this living with a Union
official as I do. It's becoming more and more common to
superintendents to over hire, claim poverty, then lay off the highest
paid teachers (assuming that they don't have a contract that RIFs by
seniority rather than teaching assignment) keeping the newer lower
paid teachers to replace them.
Frankly, I think it's unethical.
I think anything that breaks the chain of union destruction, is good for
industry.. Nothing personal..
Hehehe...this from a schmuck who couldn't hold down a unionized job as a
warehouse worker.
--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.