Harry wrote:
On 12/20/09 10:43 AM, D.Duck wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 19, 9:44 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially, politically-created
market...."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...s-cap-trade-re...


Huh - how about that...

http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...-cbo-estimate/



http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...l-require-hom/



http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...earth-cooling/



http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...en-treaty-thr/



And here's a good one about the right's idea that more CO2 is actually
good for the environment:

http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...-not-pollutan/



The gist of Tom's post was the "cap and trade" fraud in Europe and the
potential for the same here in the US. Do you disagree with that premise?


Tom has devolved into a political pseudo-scientist who goes shopping for
crap he thinks proves his points.


As if he's the only one here who does that.