In article b22eb8d0-9d66-42d5-acc9-db4ce2b568b2
@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 20, 1:24*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 8bfc5ae5-ce97-4687-8830-
, says...







On Dec 20, 12:41*pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article 339e705b-aa2c-45b0-8dfb-
,
says...

On Dec 20, 11:11*am, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article 8ab39275-4f53-4342-be57-97ae507a3f19
@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 20, 8:32*am, Jack wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:16*am, Loogypicker wrote:

On Dec 19, 9:44*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially, politically-created
market...."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...s-cap-trade-re...

Huh - how about that...

It's amazing how your side can cherry pick people's thoughts and
present just that as fact and expect everyone to eat it up. I know
that many on the right will, afterall, they'll take some lie that
Hannity or Rush tells them and run with it as the truth too.

So instead of attacking the messenger, which is your side's MO, how
about addressing the quotation. *Specifically, what part of it isn't
true, and why?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Easy! First, if you read the whole article, not just the cherry picked
parts, you'll see that they are discussing Europe's cap and trade
problems saying that we will have the same problems. This without even
knowing how we are going to model our system. Pretty audacious if the
right wing thinks that their side can predict the future.

If you look at the Czars and others President Obama has put in charge of
such policy, you can get a pretty good idea, it's not rocket science...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What in HELL does that have to do with the right acting like they have
the ability to predict the future? They've done it before too. Look at
healthcare. For some stupid reason, they think it will be like the
UK's plan. They'll bring up the failed systems and say, "see, that's
what it will be like for us". You NEVER see them point to a well
though out system that works very well and say "see, that's what it
will be like for us"......
Why? PURE politics. They would rather play politics than do what's
right for the country.

Show me where you didn't say you would rather play politics than do
what's right for the country?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That makes absolutely NO sense.

Now you are catching on...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Show me a question I asked that didn't make sense. If you are talking
about Bill's apartment falling into the ocean post, you aren't
comprehending well. HE said it had nothing to do with global warming.
Therefore, he must have some evidence of that, or why would he state
such?

Got to have a more open mind. There are those who think Global Taxing is
not happening, or just a normal cycle in which case, Global Taxing in
our context could not have had anything to do with it. I don't
necessarily agree, but I can see that side of it as it must be from
their point of view.