On Dec 23, 7:08*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene





wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28 pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....

But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?

You mean this?

"FOX FIVE NEWS COVERED ME AND MY BALL!
Hello gentle Americans. Fox Five News has commented on me and my ball
that is handing (sic) on the White House Xmas tree. Who would of
thought I would have the most famous ball in the nation! Here is the
link to the video on youtube:"

So Hedda admits it. This is some funny stuff!! The NG idiots were
claiming all day it was just a bunch of Christian wingnuts, just to
find out that they are the ones looking like idiots! You just can't
make this stuff up. Or, I guess a liberal can. ;-