"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jan 29, 2:33 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Jan 29, 12:39 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Jan 28, 10:15 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"bpuharic" wrote in message

.. .

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:22:20 -0800 (PST), Jack

wrote:

On Jan 28, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union
address
is
to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and
was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who
can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're
rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

uh...

so tell me how the lincoln bedroom affects your vote.

you right wingers...always with the non sequiturs

He's concerned that if two people have sex, it'll ruin his life.
So you're saying that Clinton had sex with the male Chinese business-
politicos that "rented" the Lincoln bedroom?

Ewwww...

I think you're the one who was proposing that, but let's say he did. How
would that ruin your life?
You thought wrong (again), I made no mention of sex, until you did

So, when you mentioned the Lincoln bedroom, you were talking about
bowling?

I mistakenly thought you were informed, my bad. Clinton "rented" out
the Lincoln bedroom for $150,000.00. That's the fact I brough up, and
it had nothing to do with sex. You are the one who evidently didn't
know about that, and thought the reference was about sex.

Hmmm... he rented it out, which is a bald face lie, but when the supposed
renters got there, they went bowling. Got it.


You proposed someone's life would be ruined if two people have sex.
Why would you think that? Failed to keep your man satisfied, huh?
What a surprise.

No, you've proposed this, since you're so concerned about Clinton's
antics.

Not all all... see above. The reference had nothing to do with sex.

Sure Jack. Whatever you say.


And, then we get the personal insults. What a surprise. You're a loser.

Just using the same tactic you do, just in a more direct manner.
You're describing yourself. No surprise.

You're just a liar. I never made any personal insults in any way close to
what you said. I noticed you cut them out... how convenient. Here they are
again:

Failed to keep your man satisfied, huh? What a surprise.


--
Nom=de=Plume