"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 9:30 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:04:54 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600,
wrote:


because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.



GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...

There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

ROFLMAO!! really? so when the govt invests in universities, it creates
no jobs by educating engineers, scientists, doctors, etc?

the only thing more pathetic than your argument

is your intellect.

Actually, educating people does not create jobs directly. It is a
capitalized reinvestment. A certain amount is good, and like anything
else, too much or too little is not good. There is a bell curve sweet
spot. Historically, I have alsways though the US did a good job on this.
Not so sure going forward.

As remember, they remove money from peoples pockets they could spend on
economic activity. Take too much and it stalls the economy.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


You are obviously a product of that under-education. Too much is bad? Too
much education is bad????? You're just plain dumb.

--
Nom=de=Plume