|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
|
|
America's Cup coming to San Francisco
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:25:06 -0500, W1TEF
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:07:48 -0500, Harryk
wrote:
On 1/3/11 1:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:46:01 -0500,
wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:53:33 -0800, wrote:
There is no such thing as a permanent job any more. Name one.
Incumbent politicians, judges, career military, Priests, Ministers,
tenured university professors and educators...that's seven - want some
more?
I guess you missed the last election, judges can be removed, never
heard of DOTD?, religious leaders can be removed, tenured educators -
maybe. That's what you're basing your jobs recovery on... that list?
You can define it personally anyway you want, the plain truth is that
the classic legal definition of permanent and temporary jobs exists,
has for a hundred or so years - the fact that you don't like it isn't
relevant.
There are no currently relevant "permanent" jobs. The fact that you
don't know squat about legal definitions isn't my fault.
You two are arguing semantics. Therefore, no winner is possible.
No, I'm stating the legal definition describing permanent and
temporary employment as found in contract and administrative law not
to mention Economics 101.
Show me an example of such a legal definition in the US. The point is
that that term and hiring under such a term is frowned upon and has
been for a long time.
Something, by the way, you are probably very familiar with being, in
part, a contract worker occasionally.
Ms. Plum is arguing her own definition of same as being reality which
it isn't.
In truth, nothing is permanent in life - including life itself, but
the definition has to exist so that some order can be made out of
hiring, firing, replacing labor or workers.
QED - so basically, you're admitting you're wrong and claiming I'm
wrong in two small paragraphs.
|