On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:06:45 -0500, Harryk
wrote:
On 2/10/11 1:42 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:42:34 -0500, wrote:
In articleHtednUYx7atDtc7QnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
What, pray tell, is a Wal-Mart chair? A chair made in China?
Are you posting from university property Paul?
Are you going to solicit commission of any felonious conspiracies today/
I leave the felonies to you felonies on the far right.
Sorry Paulie most of us on the far right are working at jobs.
Most of the posters here on the far right are federal retirees or
chronically jobless. But most of us centrists believe you are gainfully
employed.
You and your fellow travelers are by no means centrists. Your anti-
corporate and pro-big government views put squarely on the far lunatic
left.
I'm anti-corporate when it comes to exploiting US citizens. I'm
pro-big gov't when they do what they're supposed to do..
"in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure
domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the
general welfare"
Check it out. It's in the Preamble. While you're at it, read the First
Amendment.
Hey Plum, you never answered my question. If Edwards was on the ticket,
would you have voted for him?
As opposed to what? Voting for the slugs on the Republican ticket?
I would not vote for someone who lied about an affair. The situation
is that Edwards dropped out of the race, so it never came up. I would
not have voted for a slug Republican either. If it had been Edwards
(and he had been caught lying about it), I would have considered
voting for McCain right up until he picked Palin.
Maybe Max "The Swashbuckler" Riekse? lol