On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:45:20 -0500, Harryk
wrote:
On 2/13/11 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In article4ZydnSScr7Eg7cXQnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
On 2/13/11 6:33 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
In om,
says...
In ,
says...
If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....
All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.
Looks like Krause wss right about you all along.
Wasn't sure until now.
I made no statement for or against anyone. I seek only fairness from all
and fairness for all.
Bull****, with a capital B.
Please provide the quote where I pushed Brietbart?s side or Sherrod?s
side.
I mad a statement about how too many witnesses can cause problems with
trying to keep a story straight.
The original unedited video is available, and the "slightly edited to
change the meaning" edited video of Breitbart is available. If a jury
sees the tapes, it will see what Ms. Sherrod said and what Breitbart, et
al, changed the tape to make it appear she was making a racist remark.
I would guess Breitbart will offer a settlement. I hope the woman
doesn't take it.
She refused to go back to her old job after Obama's folks screwed up
with their knee jerk reaction. Seems she's a person of substance and
conviction.
I'm guessing she won't unless it's a settlement that's targeted at the
kind of smear tactics Breitbart employs.