On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 12:21:09 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 7:30 PM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:39:50 -0600, wrote:

On 19/03/2011 3:31 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm,
wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make
sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to
attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and
most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK
IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC
issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do
not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business
with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and
Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's
shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed
minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now
and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

No money to pay the bills but plenty for war. Makes Obama a war monger.


Bush started two serious wars and lowered taxes.

Actually, my memory is not short like a democrat-liberal. If I recall
correctly Bush went to a congress and from both sides of the house got
ful supprt for thse wars and taxes.

Time for Obama to realize he has been in office well over two years and
now faces a total currency collapse. An economic melt down, hyper
inflation.

Say about this time next year lets chat again. Your food prices are
aobut to take a 12% jump in one year. Hold me to it in one year. It
might be more but not less than 12%

You can't keep printing/creating money faster than Americans consume
toilet paper or the currency itself will become toilet paper.

One might wonder why anyone other than a total fool would be bringing up Bush as
an excuse for Obama.

But it is ok for Obama to use Bush as an excuse because he is black?

Bush is black? Call CNN!