|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
|
|
No blood for oil
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:59:05 -0400, Gene
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:35:11 -0700, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:02:46 -0400, Gene
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:44:57 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya?s oil goes thru France.
Let's take the first question. Is Obama attacking Libya?
Yes. Obama gave the order to shoot around 100 Tomahawk cruise missiles
at targets in Libya. Therefore Obama attacked Libya. You may say that
the UN gave Obama permission to shoot the cruise missiles but that is
just political cover for Obama attacking Libya.
Point well taken. You are correct, yet we have no troops on the
ground. Sense any difference from Bush????
Obama didn't lie to the UN or the US about WMDs.
I've posted an number of responses... and I've received few
rebuttals...
not that Obama has received a pass, but he has been forthcoming....
a shame Bush didn't take the same path...
Bush is an excuse maker. Spoiled child who never learned to take
responsibility for his actions.
|