On 07/06/2011 5:50 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600,
wrote:



AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes
that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You
will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a
Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.

notice what's missing?

the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street.

the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring
the billions we give the rich.

Hey, make me president and I would cancel that real fast. And if
corrupt senate or congress tried to jam it, I would veto it. Does not
mater be it corporate, state, civic, country or personal welfare, it is
history.

And if a banker called me, the FBI will be recording. I would even go
as far as to try to bait one in jail as an example.

For truly poor, workfare is the only social assistance left. I don't
consider earned pensions, vets and truly disabled as welfare/workfare.

Wall Street isn't the problem, corruption is. I would be so hard on
corruption, people would be going underground. Banks forging notry
publics and mortgage documents? My response is who is going to jail and
getting the 7 digit plus fine...go get them.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.