BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article d9d48428-577a-41ac-999c-
,
says...

On Sep 22, 11:12*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 9/22/2011 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Babies can't vote...

Fetuses aren't babies.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Right.

========

And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup.

No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't.

-
"That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Simple solution if it is the man telling the woman what to do with her
womb. Transplant the fetus to the man. In theory it should work. Take
some hormones for the breast milk and a C-section for delivery.

I figure it this way. For the first 16 weeks, the woman has the
exclusive choice. After that there needs to be medical reason.

But oh know, the religious idiots will not respect peoples rights. Only
conformity.

Well, resistance is not futile.

Well, if you want to go with the fringe, so be it. I am religious and I
vote for a womans right to choose. I trust the Lord will decide if she
did the right thing as I expect he will with me...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh.. He's gonna have a good time when he gets his hands on you!
"religious" indeed!

You too, Suckling Don.