On 10/19/11 12:26 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:54:43 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/18/11 9:18 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 18/10/2011 5:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/18/11 7:29 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/18/2011 7:00 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:25:37 -0400, wrote:

http://stixblog.com/2011/08/20/chang...derwear-often/

Good point. If you are negotiating with a bunch of idiots or with
people determined to undermine the process, real change isn't going to
happen.

In the unlikely event that Obama has a second term, HE will be the
idiot, if he stoops to negotiate. He was stupid enough to make that
mistake in the first 4 years.

Yeah, no meetings with republicans, "dead in the water" to any
suggestions them made, more secret meetings with Wall St and other
lobbyists than any other president in history.. Yeah, he "negotiated"
all right... uh, NOT!


I do hope that is the plan for Obama's second term.

No meetings with Republicans...
No consideration of any of their suggestions...

Yep, because 0bama be out of office.

Well, I watched about an hour of the GOP debate tonight. Cain is a
lunatic...I hope he get the bid...but Romney looks like he'll be able to
stuff in a corner based upon how hard he is trying to run away from his
record.

Did you watch the segment with Zbig that I posted last night? He has
some brilliant thoughts on the state of the presidential race, the
lack of real information, intelligence, etc.

Please watch if you haven't...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1016816.html


I'm not sure about ratting the rich out but there's some gems in here.


I saw it. He's right about the need for controls and "outing" the
irresponsible rich isn't a bad idea, either. We do need a real social
awakening in this country.