In article ,
says...

On 10/21/2011 8:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:32:02 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:24:35 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 19, 7:22 pm, X ` wrote:
On 10/19/11 8:17 PM, Tim wrote:









On Oct 19, 7:07 pm, X ` wrote:
On 10/19/11 7:53 PM, Tim wrote:

After living in the US for several years, it looks like his aunt
received some kind of amnesty a year ago for medical and political
reasons.

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kouri/100518

And his uncle was granted "backdoor amnesty' a month ago. then
disapeared from sight.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...airman-obama-u...

Shocking!

snerk

illegal residence+ drunk driving= amnesty?

I really do think there's more to the story....

It should be thoroughly investigated after dick cheney is broght to
justice.

Why after?

Not a bad question, but let's ask it this way. Why does Cheney get a
pass, while we nail Obama to the wall?

Personally, I think we should go after both of them, but if we don't
do both, what will we use as a criteria to go after only one?

Do you lack any sense of moral or ethical equivalence?

Go after Obama for giving his relatives a free pass? You really think
he had anything to do with it?

This is just like trying to pin the inequalities on the 1%. They
don't have to spend money protecting themselves, they've got minions
who'll do their bidding for free, out of friendship, a sense of
responsiblity to protect business partners, friends and family, etc.
Very few put resources out there like the Koch brothers.

Cheney, on the other hand, outed Valarie Plame and had a direct hand
in manipulating information that got us involved in an inexcusable
conflict that cost our country dearly.

Richard Armitage outed Valarie Plame. He even admitted it.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1981433.shtml


Be careful Bar,facts don't do well here...

That's no ****, you've made up some real whoppers here lately!