On 12/18/2011 3:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In raweb.com, .
@..com says...

On 12/18/2011 2:47 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 12/18/11 2:39 PM, Drifter wrote:
Have studies been completed on how best to deal with the mute swan?


The point, dumbfoch, is not that the swans are deleterious to the Bay.
No one is disputing that. The point is that once again our resident
righties are jumping on the bandwagon of "kill, kill, kill" to get rid
of a problem we created.

Was there ever a time when you boys or your ancestors could think in the
abstract, or is that just anathema to the right wing?

Get off your little soap box you fripping idiot. I only lifted
information on what agencies in your area are advocating. The swans are
a menace caused by citizens like you who won't leave wildlife be. How's
that "Pet" bobcat of yours doing. Or the wildlife you attract to your
yard with food that is probably not healthy for the poor critters. You
do this because you are too fat and lazy to go out in the woods to view
the animals in their own habitat. Choke on that you repulsive piece of
****e.

Well, we all know how lazy the fat ass is, but I think he won't go out
in the woods to view wildlife because he's a coward.

Yes, I do recall that he is so afraid of dogs in the woods, that he
locks and loads a pistola or two, when he has to go into the woods.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error