On 31/03/2012 5:11 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:22:51 -0700, wrote:

On 3/30/2012 9:52 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 3/30/2012 11:37 AM, thumper wrote:
On 3/30/2012 4:45 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleFOidnU6ym8ULEOjSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

Conservatives' Trust in Science at All-Time Low
A new study suggests a growing partisan divide as science plays an
increasing role in policy debates.

"Science" has politicized itself to the point of reducing confidence in
the "scientists" very low, somewhere near a used car salesman and a
Congressman.



http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/the_..._conservative/




Salon.com Sheesh. You discovered Krause's playbook. What a joke, Thumpy

Can't address the content?

Why? The author lies, just as does the one who posted the article here.

"The only reasonable verdict is that humans did it, in the atmosphere, with their cars and their
smokestacks. "

Such bull****. And he goes on from there...

Yep, would like to hear the liberal-socialists explain how my SUT melted
mars polar caps and IO surface ice.

Or how the antarctic if so permanent, why is 2/3rd th ice less than
10,000 years old?

Or how having more growing season for fish, plants, food in the north
and south is such a bad thing?

Sure beats Toronto and Buffalo being under 3 kilometers of ice in the
ice age. Be nicer to see ferns return to the north slopes of Alaska
like when live diversity on earth was at its peek.

Or how low sunspot activity, my SUT did that too.

Fact is they deal in fear of change and FUD for profit and political gain.

--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing.