BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - Local young-uns do good

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1-
,

says...

Man, wish I had some money in this local company...
http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant

What's a "young-uns" spelling guru?

Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what
they
believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault.

Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries.

Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be
pointing out
what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass.

Cite? Google it, moron.

Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer.

You can't even "google" a word?

young-uns isn't a word.

It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line.
It is by definition a word.

Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not
in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t

The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the
dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty.

My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many
"Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many
free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their
intended purposes.

It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality,"
since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post.

And young-uns isn't a word.