On Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:08:13 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:54:12 -0400, X ` Man

wrote:



On 8/16/12 11:47 AM, jps wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:



On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"

wrote:



....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may

have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?



None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing

tried.



You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would

be intellectually trampled badly.



I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.



When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is

overlooked.



When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the

group, at least there's some interaction. I don't know who *e#c is

since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the

feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people

interacting on subjects that don't include boats.



I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and

Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.







There's really no reason to put up "boating-related" posts here. If

Poster A said he just bought a nice old dory to refinish in his garage

over the winter, three or four of the right-wing droolers and iLoogy

would initiate attacks on the poster's boat of choice and the color he

planned to paint it.



Why bother?



So true. Why not just get to the stuff that matters. They're idiots

are we're not so much.

"They're idiots are we're not so much. "
What idiot wrote that?