On 9/7/2012 8:33 PM, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:17:50 -0700, Califbill wrote:


Did you read the report? It lays out a scenario to possibly be 20% by
2030,
but do not state it is feasible.

"
As summarized at the end of this chapter, the analysis provides an
overview of some potential impacts of these two scenarios by 2030. This
report does not compare the Wind Scenario to other energy portfolio
options, nor does it outline an action plan.
To successfully address energy security and environmental issues, the
nation needs to pursue a portfolio of energy options. None of these
options by itself can fully address these issues; there is no “silver
bullet.” This technical report examines one potential scenario in which
wind power serves as a significant element in the portfolio. However,
the 20% Wind Scenario is not a prediction of the future. Instead, it
paints a picture of what a particular 20% Wind Scenario could mean for
the nation.
"

No, I haven't read the report yet. I was reading a wiki when I
mistakenly thought that is was a plan, not just a report. Still, if we
could get to 20% that would be a good thing. There is a plan for 350 MV
off shore here in NJ, but it has been kicking around for several years
with out much movement to my knowledge.


So, really you are just daydreaming and using those daydreams as facts
in your conversations... I get it...