On 9/23/2012 7:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:14:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Saturday, September 22, 2012 11:35:00 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,

says...



On 9/22/2012 10:18 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G







Break it down in your own words.



4G is faster than 3G.

You almost got it right.

4G peak speeds are much faster than 3G peak speeds.

But 4G in fringe, "barely get a signal" areas is slower than 3G in good signal areas. Like in Scot's case.

That's all he, and I, have been saying. For a huge segment of the population, 4G isn't an option. Reference the coverage map I linked.

You are far too dense to understand. A dog watching TV.

If you ARE in 4G, though, it is BLAZING. Much faster than WIFI.

No, no you haven't been listening to the experts here!!!

Everyone's experience with 2g 3g and 4g is different depending on many
factors.