On 3/3/13 12:42 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:11:24 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 3/3/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/3/13 10:46 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,

says...


On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 18:57:36 -0800 (PST), True North

wrote:

On Friday, 1 March 2013 15:50:10 UTC-4, True North wrote:

http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...s-for-titanic-

ii-ma
iden-voyage-in-2016



todays update......
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-s...titanic-replic

a-h
alifax.html


Nah, I think I'd rather take this guy to Europe:
http://tinyurl.com/aeegdow

It's a real (not 'Wedding Cake') ship, leaves Galveston 18 May and
arrives in
Barcelona a couple
weeks later. Then it cruises the Mediterranean for a while.

Probably be a lot safer than something made in China. Do you reckon
WalMart
will
be selling tickets
for the Titanic II ?
--
Salmonbait

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

I hope you won't mind being flooded with Disney stuff.


It's a cruise ship, not an ocean liner.

Look up the fate of 20th century ocean liners and you might well take
your chances with Disney; O senile one.

That 'cruise ship' leaves Galveston on 18 May to cross the Atlantic *OCEAN* to get to Barcelona.
From there it will make several cruises throughout the Mediterranean before crossing the *OCEAN*
again to return to the USA. Here we have a 'cruise' ship which is also an ocean liner - 'cause it's
a real ship and not a marshmallow pile.


It's a cruise ship, not an ocean liner. There are significant design and
construction differences, not that these would have any meaning for an
alternative world guy like you.