On 3/15/13 12:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:
No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.
Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s
abortions?
The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.
And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?
As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.
I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down
clinics.
So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.
Perhaps you should expand your research venues.
Yes, the answer to my question is there are no women in the US who don't
have access because of the Church.
If that Mississippi clinic is forced to close, lower income women in
Mississippi will not have reasonable access to a clinic, especially
since other southern states are proceeding similarly.