On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote
"jps" wrote in message
...


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the
teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?


Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.


You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?


Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.


The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.


-------------------------------------




Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more
convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my
wife
before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff.

Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up
your mind.
But according to harry, it's a no brainer.