On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:03:07 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 3/22/2013 11:36 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 3/20/13 2:00 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:22:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/20/13 8:01 AM, J Herring wrote:
....down your throat:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/islamic-law-comes-to-rebel-held-syria/2013/03/19/b310532e-90af-11e2-bdea-e32ad90da239_story.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzheads


Yup, the Muslim Brotherhood is after our hearts and souls. Let's
keep rooting for the rebels -
they'll bring DEOMOCRACY to the region.

Right.


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!


One can depend on our boy Herring to support brutal, right-wing
dictators wherever and whenever they are found.

There's nothing brutal about Sharia Authority?

"But, increasingly, the dominant role is falling to Jabhat al-Nusra,
also known as the al-Nusra
Front. The group has been designated a terrorist organization by the
United States..."

Apparently I'm not the only one who thinks there may be a problem there.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


Syria is a problem state no matter who is in charge there. What's your
solution?


--------------------

Simple. Stay out of the conflict and let each side kill off the the
other side. Same thing we should have done in the Balkans and a lot of
other places.


So what you are really saying is "let Israel get pushed into the Ocean"?

Why should the U.S. be the protecter of Israel?

I think we should support them as long as they support human rights,
and we should push them to deal with palestinians and stop building
new settlements. We have a strategic interest in the area, and they're
a stable democracy.