On 4/4/13 1:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:56:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read.

"I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun
purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers,
and I said so."

Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that
Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about
to happen in this state.


What is the difference between 'lack of opposition' and 'not opposed'?

What is the difference between 'NOT opposed to...mandatory safety training' and 'being pro safety
training'?

Reading comprehension comments???

Tell us about those 'special circumstances', ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



The "I said so" part.