On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:28:52 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 12:55:23 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article
,
says...

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:23:56 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:58:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:19:00 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:02:21 -0700, jps wrote:


Ten people were hurt

You understand you are the only troll here for about a week.

Take it somewhere else.

And miss out on all the fine posts about trailers and trucks?

**** no, this is my home sweet home.

====

Trailers and trucks are at least related to towing boats which is a
common and on-topic issue.

Your anti gun screeds however are not, and this is most definitely not
your home.

Oh but it is Wayne. Just as much as it is yours.

Boats and guns go together like beans and rice. I need a gun to
protect my boat.

Maybe lay off until the gun nuts start talking
about their guns again. I suspect their gun
talk offends you, and I'll tell you it
offends me.
I find all guns offensive unless it's mine.
Talking about them in a public forum not meant
for that sort of discussion is akin to talking
about your masturbation habits. Gun nuts
don't understand that, because they're gun
nuts.
An exception here would be an anti-pirate gun
kept on the boat, for those who travel in
pirate waters. Those bringing that up will be
quickly told that pirates have more and bigger
guns, so you'll probably just increase your
chance of getting yourself killed.
Of course the NRA would contest that, and say
that simply having more guns aboard to equip
everybody in your family/crew/squad is how it
should be done to ward off the "bad guys."
Maybe another "exception" would be an anti-
shark gun kept on the boat, to which the
answer would be don't swim with sharks, and
don't shoot at sharks circling a swimmer.
You might kill the swimmer, and if you blood
the shark, you'll just attract more....sharks.
I have no real problem ignoring the gun
threads too often started here. I usually
only respond when I feel like calling gun nuts
trash, which is as it should be. They fully
deserve it.
I don't know why these guys get on your case
for reporting news. They can ignore your
posts. They don't. Their problem.
But you might lay off until they start another
of their gun jack off sessions, to see how
long that lasts.
Hypocrisy and faulty logic should be called
out. So give them a chance to show it again.
Makes for a more balanced circle of nonsense.
If they want to talk about boats, nobody's
stopping them.

The news makes 'em feel bad about their love of guns.

I don't mind those who own guns responsibly and I suspect the gun nuts
in rec.boats are responsible. What irks the **** out of me is when
responsible owners start talking about gun rights. As if they were
more important than any other right, including safety of the general
population from an over abundance of guns that make it out into the
streets and promote violence and easy answers to hard problems.

These jerks would give up all their rights to privacy, search and
seizure, free speech and whatever else as long as they can keep there
little dick extensions.

Meanwhile, the country's kids are at risk from idiots who can't manage
to keep their guns locked up.

More people have died riding in a car with Ted Kennedy than have died from any firearms I may
own. A responsible person doesn't kill, or cause the death of, an innocent young lady by
leaving them to drown in a submerged car.

If you want to talk about responsibility then talk about responsibility and not just aboue
firearms.

The "gun rights" are enshrined in the US Constitution. The police are not available to
protect you and if you depend upon them to assist you, you may be dead before they ever get
to your house.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/06/...s-to-new-york-
citys-new-911-system/


Not even worth responding to. Your attempt at moral equivalents is
lost. Ted Kennedy doesn't leave girls to drown 30,000 times a year.