Thread: My take
View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
F.O.A.D. F.O.A.D. is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default My take

On 7/16/13 12:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/16/2013 10:39 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:10:29 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Here's my take on the Zimmerman/Martin thing.

Zimmerman is a well intentioned law enforcement wannabe civilian who
overstepped the boundaries of the recommended procedures established
in the "Neighborhood Crime Watch" organizational structure,
established in concert with the local police department. What he
did was not illegal, but was contrary to recommended procedure
recommended by the Neighborhood Crime Watch representative from the
police department. (She is also a civilian and not a cop).

Really doesn't matter when he left his car or if he "followed" Martin.
Both actions are not illegal.

When he confronted Martin, some words were exchanged. Martin then
clobbered Zimmerman with a haymaker to the nose.

Zimmerman fell to the ground, Martin jumped on top of him and either
threw some more punches and/or started smacking Zimmerman's head on
the concrete.

Zimmerman tried to resist and started screaming for help.

The beating continued. Zimmerman found his gun and shot
Martin.

Martin fell backwards and then onto the ground.

That's it.

The rest of the bull**** being promoted in the media with regard to
race issues, hate crime, etc., is nothing but that ..... pure
bull****.



Supported by evidence, and probably what the jury saw also. Don't know about the falling backwards
though.

John (Gun Nut) H.


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...


Oh, so now anyone who doesn't conform to your idea of right and good can
be killed without ramification?


Snotty is more of a "thug" than Martin was.