On 7/16/2013 1:55 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly what
Treyvon was all about.

---------------------------------

Relax. All I said was that he does *not* have a criminal police record.



No, you directly addressed the assertion that he (Martin) had an
*increasing* criminal record. I assumed your meant that you "disagree
with the (your) assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record"... when you said: I disagree with your assertion of Martin
having an "increasing criminal record".

Sorry if I read it wrong... My point is (in case you decide to go back
and read what you wrote, and the context of the topic at hand) that it
seems that Martin indeed did have a great possibility of developing an
"increasing criminal record" sooner than later... But again, you could
have read you wrong