BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_3_]

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.

Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?

Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash

I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk,
confront and shoot. Zimmerman was.

If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he
simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage
of knowing where he was.?

Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking
and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a
distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add.

I remember that.

John (Gun Nut) H.

That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your
narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope
you have much less now with that bull****.

Are you saying I *don't* remember that?

If you remember Harry going to Baltimore harbor with "sole intention of
stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors" you are
indeed either a liar or senile. Which one?