BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_3_]

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:10:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:39:25 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:55:40 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:13:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:54:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 7/16/13 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:21:54 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

"These assholes always get away". Yep, meek and timid.
Answer to "are you following him"..... "YES". Very meek.
He DID go after him.

They were about 10-15 feet apart when he first saw Martin. If he was
"going after" Martin, the confrontation would have happened several
feet from the front gate, 15 seconds later not down in the middle of
the community 4 minutes later..
It is clear he tried to keep his distance and "watch" Martin until the
police arrived.

You mean, he was stalking Martin.

But Scotty and Greg have cleared it up! It's okay to kill teens that
they think are "thugs", who've smoked pot and were accused of petty
theft.

...and has you on the ground hitting your head on concrete after breaking your nose.

Makes good sense. You just need to complete your sentences.

John (Gun Nut) H.

Did you not hear the expert witness say that the injuries were "very
minor" or did you just not understand it?

Uh, the state's 'expert witnesses' weren't too 'expert' or believable. Before you say 'cite', check
the results of the trial.

John (Gun Nut) H.

What makes you think that they weren't "expert"? Do you know or realize
what their credentials are, or are you just lip syncing to FOX again?

Actually, I watched and listened to them on CNN. Fox didn't have near the coverage provided by CNN.
But then, FOX wasn't pushing for a guilty verdict with no evidence as were you, Harry, MSNBC, Al,
Jesse, CNN (and most of their 'analysts'), etc., etc.

John (Gun Nut) H.

Well then, show me where you came to the conclusion that the person
testifying was not an expert. It's that simple. Put up or shut up.

I reached the same conclusions about your 'expert' that the jury did.

Cite?

I just *said* it!!

There. It's been put up. Now shut up.

John (Gun Nut) H.

ESAD, Mr. Senility.

Hey, name-calling is good when you lose. Harry pretends he plonks. Maybe you should consider that
also.

John (Gun Nut) H.

Do you mean like "****ing liberals"? Because a senile, stupid coot says
something it's true?!!