Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oz, you must cease and desist with this virtual cruelty. You
_know_ what happens when you start playing around in gun threads. And you gotta remember, the artistic types get very upset very fast (check out the bio: http://members.cox.net/demosmasters/dtbio.html ANd anyway, isn't it Donal who's in Solent? and you who's in solvent? And Danny Taddei on .asa is already immortalised anyway in the ..asa verses archive http://www.ace.net.au/schooner/asapo.htm Too much effort to update it... Flying Tadpole Oz1 wrote: Not as intelligent but showing good form. Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oz1 wrote:
BTW Tadpole, a little more twist in Lady Kates main would hav allowed her to stay more upright and punch thru the slop better. Reduces the effect of the bullets too. Try it next time....today even. Sigh. Yes, you're right. I must be losing my touch. Oversheeting has always been my deadliest sin on all my gaffers. I'm sure I rail about it in the how-to-sail-a-schooner tips. And I probably should have eased th peak a little to allow more twist too. BTW the windward performance did pick up when I gave up and rehoist the mizzen to go with the triple-reefed main, and eased the sheets to bring the 60 deg heel back to 30. On the chart, I made perhaps half a mile to windward in 9 miles under the triple-reefed main alone, then 2.5 miles to windward over the nex 8.5 miles. Perhaps the twistless oversheeted sail was a post-hypnotic suggestion response to all Bobsprit's sailing photos with a midline-sheeted boom? FT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Oz1 wrote: Would the outboard push you to windward in those conditions? ;- On which topic: a fascinating small book which you may be able to get out of a larger library is Ron Thiele (1987) "Ketch hand: the twilight of sail in South Australian waters" Main'sle Books, PO Box 316 Portland, Victoria 3305 (Australia) ISBN 0-7316-1551-4 One of the interesting facets is that quite a proportion of the remaining mosquito fleet of coastal ketches and schooners after 1945 were lost, because they were bought, cheap, by non-sailors just back from the war planning shark fisheries or tourist ventures or just wandering. On the SA lee coasts, hit by westerly changes (always on delivery/pickup voyages) they forgot that they were sailing a sailing ship and relied not on the sails but on the auxiliary motors, which being crank, or ancient, or simply inadequate, lost their small ships. If they'd sailed them, they'd mostly have survived. In neither of my admittedly iconoclastic craft has the motor ever been the device to rely on in times of trouble. Many tell me that this is _not_ the case in a _proper_ sailboat, where the auxiliary is _always_ to be depneded on, and indeed started at the first sign of trouble. But somehow, I fail to be convinced. PS. I must say, the ancient 9.9 Honda renders the miseries of the more ancient Tadpole seagull to distant memory. But there is always a sail up, except in the marina where they won't allow it, and in there, there's always an anchor for that happy day when the motor dies unexpectedly. And no: the 9.9 would be totally inadequate to push to windward directly in that chop. It wouldn't be in the water long enough...I did use it as a sail assist at one stage though. Flying Tadpole |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It IS a long shaft OB, dammit! To power directly into that chop
without pushing air 3/4s of the time would need something like 5 ft between engine and prop....Using the motor on a tack as a boost works fine, no air propeller at at all and the motor doesn't stress or blow up, but I didn't resort to that until i was really running out of time (unlit confined rocky and shoaly waters to get through to a reasonable anchorage) because part of the point of the exercise is to keep the _sailing_ skills shiny. Were you seriously suggesting I drop sail and rely on a motor??????? Flying Tadpole Oz1 wrote: snip Why don't you look for a long shaft OB to do the work? On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 21:58:46 +0930, Flying Tadpole wrote: Oz1 wrote: Would the outboard push you to windward in those conditions? ;- On which topic: a fascinating small book which you may be able to get out of a larger library is Ron Thiele (1987) "Ketch hand: the twilight of sail in South Australian waters" Main'sle Books, PO Box 316 Portland, Victoria 3305 (Australia) ISBN 0-7316-1551-4 One of the interesting facets is that quite a proportion of the remaining mosquito fleet of coastal ketches and schooners after 1945 were lost, because they were bought, cheap, by non-sailors just back from the war planning shark fisheries or tourist ventures or just wandering. On the SA lee coasts, hit by westerly changes (always on delivery/pickup voyages) they forgot that they were sailing a sailing ship and relied not on the sails but on the auxiliary motors, which being crank, or ancient, or simply inadequate, lost their small ships. If they'd sailed them, they'd mostly have survived. In neither of my admittedly iconoclastic craft has the motor ever been the device to rely on in times of trouble. Many tell me that this is _not_ the case in a _proper_ sailboat, where the auxiliary is _always_ to be depneded on, and indeed started at the first sign of trouble. But somehow, I fail to be convinced. PS. I must say, the ancient 9.9 Honda renders the miseries of the more ancient Tadpole seagull to distant memory. But there is always a sail up, except in the marina where they won't allow it, and in there, there's always an anchor for that happy day when the motor dies unexpectedly. And no: the 9.9 would be totally inadequate to push to windward directly in that chop. It wouldn't be in the water long enough...I did use it as a sail assist at one stage though. Flying Tadpole Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Oz1 wrote: BTW have they opened the bar yet? No. The River Murray Mouth is now not so much just a bar, but more an entire hotel strip. At current rates, I would say there'll be a sandhill across most of it by this time '04. Mind you, the $000,000s spent on dredging used a dredge incapable of dredging the actual mouth, so they just dredged past it on the land ward side, to link Goolwa and the Coorong. They've failed abjectly at that too. Flying Tadpole |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radial play | General | |||
OT--Don't play politics on Iraq | General | |||
Well, I'd love to stay and play but ... | General |