Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you saying "Nope - the rules DON'T apply in waters connected with the high seas" or
"Nope - the local authorities can do whatever they damn well please" ? In my rather brief survey of several states I found that the special rules on "human powered vessels" only apply in specific inland lakes and rivers. However, there are a variety of special rules that imply a state might be able to do this. Some apply to jetskis, other apply to how close you can go to swimmers or divers. I could imagine a reg that says you can't get too close to a rowboat. A reason why I've always wondered about this is that I've done a lot of sailing, since 1957, in the Charles River Basin that is shared with a number of collegiate and public rowing clubs - Harvard, MIT, BU, Northeastern, etc. All of the sailing clubs in the basin have and still tell their members that rowboats have absolute right-of-way. While this is probably a good idea, I was surprised to find it was not actually true under the law. "Gerard Weatherby" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:19:56 -0400, "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote: But these rules do not apply (as far as I know) in the waters covered by ColRegs. Nope. Rule 1(b) says: "(b) Nothing in these Rules shall interfere with the operation of spe-cial rules made by an appropriate authority for roadsteads, harbors, rivers, lakes or inland waterways connected with the high seas and navigable by seagoing vessels. Such special rules shall conform as closely as possible to these Rules." S/V Cat's Meow http://www.catsmeow.org |
#92
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:45:03 -0400, "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom
wrote: "Nope - the local authorities can do whatever they damn well please" ? Yes. That's what it says. For example, despite repeated claims that sailboats have the "right of way" over powerboats, if the powerboat happens to be a US Naval vessel it's a felony to pass within a certain number of yards without permission. And the Coast Guard boat out in front will remind you of that. There are also speed limits and no-wake zones, restrictions on anchoring and mooring, etc, imposed by local authorities. S/V Cat's Meow http://www.catsmeow.org |
#93
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but the rule does say the whenever possible, the local regs should be constant with
the ColRegs. Declaring security zones and managing mooring and traffic is a traditional function of local authorities, especially in harbors. Do you know any instances of adding new "right of way" rules that apply in the ocean waters of a state? Frankly, although it been claimed that ferries have privilege while on their routes, I've seen very few actual regs to that affect. I just scanned several North East Coast Pilots looking for such a thing and didn't find any. Same for "regatta privilege" - I know MD has a law, but its been claimed there is a federal law, though I've never been able to find it. "Gerard Weatherby" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:45:03 -0400, "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote: "Nope - the local authorities can do whatever they damn well please" ? Yes. That's what it says. For example, despite repeated claims that sailboats have the "right of way" over powerboats, if the powerboat happens to be a US Naval vessel it's a felony to pass within a certain number of yards without permission. And the Coast Guard boat out in front will remind you of that. There are also speed limits and no-wake zones, restrictions on anchoring and mooring, etc, imposed by local authorities. S/V Cat's Meow http://www.catsmeow.org |
#94
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff Morris wrote: Yes, but the rule does say the whenever possible, the local regs should be constant with the ColRegs. Declaring security zones and managing mooring and traffic is a traditional function of local authorities, especially in harbors. Do you know any instances of adding new "right of way" rules that apply in the ocean waters of a state? In most cases, you will find that these rules are case specific for a particular event or highly limited local area. Since the "States" have no authority over "ocean waters" of the particular state, where Rules of the Road are concerned, you shouldn't (yet) see any bogus laws regarding rules, past "demarcation" points. Frankly, although it been claimed that ferries have privilege while on their routes, I've seen very few actual regs to that affect. I just scanned several North East Coast Pilots looking for such a thing and didn't find any. Same for "regatta privilege" - I know MD has a law, but its been claimed there is a federal law, though I've never been able to find it. There may be some local law regarding "Staten Island" ferries, but I have never heard of any other local law (that would have affected me) giving "ferries", special dispensation, regarding the rules ..... why? "Gerard Weatherby" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:45:03 -0400, "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote: "Nope - the local authorities can do whatever they damn well please" ? Yes. That's what it says. For example, despite repeated claims that sailboats have the "right of way" over powerboats, if the powerboat happens to be a US Naval vessel it's a felony to pass within a certain number of yards without permission. And the Coast Guard boat out in front will remind you of that. There are also speed limits and no-wake zones, restrictions on anchoring and mooring, etc, imposed by local authorities. S/V Cat's Meow http://www.catsmeow.org |
#95
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "otnmbrd" wrote in message k.net... Jeff Morris wrote: Yes, but the rule does say the whenever possible, the local regs should be constant with the ColRegs. Declaring security zones and managing mooring and traffic is a traditional function of local authorities, especially in harbors. Do you know any instances of adding new "right of way" rules that apply in the ocean waters of a state? In most cases, you will find that these rules are case specific for a particular event or highly limited local area. Since the "States" have no authority over "ocean waters" of the particular state, where Rules of the Road are concerned, you shouldn't (yet) see any bogus laws regarding rules, past "demarcation" points. Well, I didn't reall mean outside the ColRegs line - I was thinking waters inside the line, but not in busy harbors. FOr instance, The Maine Island Trail®, which goes 325 miles through coastal Maine, most of it inside the line but in salt water: http://www.mita.org/faq.html Frankly, although it been claimed that ferries have privilege while on their routes, I've seen very few actual regs to that affect. I just scanned several North East Coast Pilots looking for such a thing and didn't find any. Same for "regatta privilege" - I know MD has a law, but its been claimed there is a federal law, though I've never been able to find it. There may be some local law regarding "Staten Island" ferries, but I have never heard of any other local law (that would have affected me) giving "ferries", special dispensation, regarding the rules ..... why? see Cappy's Master's response. Have you seen regs like that in the U.S.? |
#96
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff Morris wrote: see Cappy's Master's response. Have you seen regs like that in the U.S.? None that I remember, but that does not mean they don't exist. The only way I can think of to check, easily, for most boaters, would be to look in the "Navigation Regulations" of the Coast Pilot for your area or in the general information for a particular port, where you might have "heavy" ferry traffic. It will not surprise me, in time, if we see special regulations regarding "high speed" ferries. otn |
#97
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:43:14 +1000, The Cappys Master wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:27:17 -0400, "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote: Yes, but the rule does say the whenever possible, the local regs should be constant with the ColRegs. Declaring security zones and managing mooring and traffic is a traditional function of local authorities, especially in harbors. Do you know any instances of adding new "right of way" rules that apply in the ocean waters of a state? Frankly, although it been claimed that ferries have privilege while on their routes, I've seen very few actual regs to that affect. I just scanned several North East Coast Pilots looking for such a thing and didn't find any. Same for "regatta privilege" - I know MD has a law, but its been claimed there is a federal law, though I've never been able to find it. Syndey Harbour ferries DO have right of way over sail Go to http://www.waterways.nsw.gov.au/index.html boating safety then collision regulation links Priority Over Sail Some Commercial ferries on Sydney Harbour display an orange diamond shape which grants priority of way over sailing vessels. Do not attempt to cross the path of an approaching ferry displaying this signal. http://www.waterways.nsw.gov.au/onwater.html This was brought into effect after a friend of mine was minced in the propellors of a ferry. They were crossing its bows under sail in a Soling , collided and when the ferry skipper used reverse to stop, he was drawn into the front props, the ferries are double ended. Yeah - that's what I meant with my comment to Simon. Didn't recall the exact circumstance, but I knew Sydney ferries have ROW over sail and only an idiot argues with them. PDW |
#98
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL Well, I guess THIS thread has run it's course and Neal has gone sailing
(read, sequestered himself to lick his wounds and try to come up with a lame response) EG Shen |