Nik wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 06:36:18 GMT, Toon wrote:

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 10:04:17 +1200, Nik
wrote:

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:13:26 GMT, Toon wrote:

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:25:15 +1200, Nik
wrote:

On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:09:41 -0500, D Wolf
wrote:

On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:20:49 +0200, John VanSickle
wrote:

And a lot of atheists believe that the case against the existence of
God is proven beyond all doubt.


You claim, it YOU prove it, its very simple.

Occams Razor.

That proves God. it is far simpler to believe someone decided on
everything, then to believe in the complexity of randomness creating
via evolution and natural selection.

Course, that crumb bum God uses evolution Himself, but he lacks love
for what he evolves. Or creates, or anything, really. Crumb bum.

The problem is that humanities' individual and/or collective
experience of the nature of 'god' might be a bit mistaken. Attributing
'Perfect Goodness' to a being, seems to me, to placing a very hard
stricture to live up to, even whilst being a Deity.

The God that I worship, Odin, isn't even 'Good' in the everyday sense
that we humans use. Odin is about victory, knowledge, poetry and the
Wild Hunt. I look up to Odin.

Nik

Well, look at the Christian telling of God. He's clearly psychotic,
and has issues galore, and one heck of an ego problem. Anyone who
deliberately creates Hell as the bible describes is off their rocker.
End of story. And God set up Adam and Eve to fall. Dude has serious
trust issues. Supreme beings with insecurities are not good people.

I had never considered those particular issues before. Thanks for
that.


Oh you are truly a considerate and open minded individual Njikky. I
have never seen this side of you before.

Why didn't you do this in the first place?

Shall I guess_?

Bwawhahwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwshawahwhahwhhah!



Bertie