LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

TIMECNN POLL: Most Registered Voters Would Choose Bush
Fri Nov 21 2003 19:44:24 ET

New York - If the 2004 Presidential election was held today,
registered voters surveyed for TIME/CNN would choose
President George W. Bush over any of the declared Democratic candidates.

In a direct run against Bush, Gen. Wesley Clark fares the best
among registered voters (Clark 42%, Bush 49%), closely followed
by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (Kerry 41%, Bush 49%).

Bush would beat any of three other Democrats, 52 percent to
39 percent, in a direct match: Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt,
Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, or Vermont Gov. Howard
Dean. Against Bush, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards would
lose, 38 percent to 52 percent.

When registered Democrats are asked which Democratic
presidential nominee they would vote for, Dean edges out
Clark 14 percent to 12 percent, followed Lieberman (11%),
Kerry (9%), Gephardt (6%), then Edwards and the Rev. Al
Sharpton (5%).

The TIME/CNN Poll, conducted November 18-19, 2003 by Harris
Interactive, surveyed 1,330 registered voters by telephone.
The margin of error is +/-2.7% points for registered voters,
and +/-4.7% for Democratic voters surveyed for TIME/CNN.


  #2   Report Post  
larry flint a.k.a lawrence stone
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392
Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)

  #3   Report Post  
two wheels
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 03:23:41 GMT, larry flint a.k.a lawrence stone
wrote:

Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392
Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)


Interesting, but there aren't enough neo-socialist States (like NY
or MA) to pull it off.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBP799TdCBA23eyf45EQKTOQCggnSoKu3UNrqqIcWZKSL8Mq yofksAn0RJ
aiWATngWYLPhR8lfAmQ63sU7
=HQv8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  #4   Report Post  
N1EE
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

Hillary is frightened to run against Bush.

larry flint a.k.a lawrence stone wrote

Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392
Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)

  #5   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

Just you wait. It's still early. If Clark is only 7 points behind now, with
no
money and a brand new entry into the field, he doesn't have far to go. I
suppose you think he's soft on foreign policy or the military.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
TIMECNN POLL: Most Registered Voters Would Choose Bush
Fri Nov 21 2003 19:44:24 ET

New York - If the 2004 Presidential election was held today,
registered voters surveyed for TIME/CNN would choose
President George W. Bush over any of the declared Democratic candidates.

In a direct run against Bush, Gen. Wesley Clark fares the best
among registered voters (Clark 42%, Bush 49%), closely followed
by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (Kerry 41%, Bush 49%).

Bush would beat any of three other Democrats, 52 percent to
39 percent, in a direct match: Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt,
Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, or Vermont Gov. Howard
Dean. Against Bush, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards would
lose, 38 percent to 52 percent.

When registered Democrats are asked which Democratic
presidential nominee they would vote for, Dean edges out
Clark 14 percent to 12 percent, followed Lieberman (11%),
Kerry (9%), Gephardt (6%), then Edwards and the Rev. Al
Sharpton (5%).

The TIME/CNN Poll, conducted November 18-19, 2003 by Harris
Interactive, surveyed 1,330 registered voters by telephone.
The margin of error is +/-2.7% points for registered voters,
and +/-4.7% for Democratic voters surveyed for TIME/CNN.






  #6   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

That's probably true. She would come off as the intellectual
she is vs. the moron Bush is. Unfortunately, many people in
this country resent intelligent people.

"N1EE" wrote in message
om...
Hillary is frightened to run against Bush.

larry flint a.k.a lawrence stone wrote

Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392
Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)



  #7   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats


I do hope Hillary runs. She'll lose by a bigger margin than
Dean or Clark. If she has any chance at all it will only
be in 2008 and she knows if she runs and loses in 2004
then there is no 2008 for her.

Seriously, in today's perilous world who's gonna put
their trust in a woman with no experience other than
babysitting a former President who didn't respect
her or the office of President enough to refrain
from debauchery in the White House with his young
intern then lying and perjuring himself while trying
to suborn witnesses at the impeachment trial.

The country is happy to put that immoral and sad
chapter behind and does not wish to have reminders
in the way of the jilted wife of a failed, immoral former
President to bring it all back.

S.Simon




"larry flint a.k.a lawrence stone" wrote in message ...
Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392
Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)



  #8   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

Yeah, and put a former drunk in the office.... sure.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

I do hope Hillary runs. She'll lose by a bigger margin than
Dean or Clark. If she has any chance at all it will only
be in 2008 and she knows if she runs and loses in 2004
then there is no 2008 for her.

Seriously, in today's perilous world who's gonna put
their trust in a woman with no experience other than
babysitting a former President who didn't respect
her or the office of President enough to refrain
from debauchery in the White House with his young
intern then lying and perjuring himself while trying
to suborn witnesses at the impeachment trial.

The country is happy to put that immoral and sad
chapter behind and does not wish to have reminders
in the way of the jilted wife of a failed, immoral former
President to bring it all back.

S.Simon




"larry flint a.k.a lawrence stone" wrote in message

...
Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392
Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)





  #9   Report Post  
N1EE
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats

Have you noticed how ****ed off the liberals are
about the Medicare bill that just passed in the
House of Representatives?

The are ****ed only because it was sponsored by
conservatives. They hate and fear Bush because he
pulls the carpet out under their feet so often.
The liberals sure look funny with no legs to stand on.

Here is a case of a bill they would love, if
they sponsored it, but they have to scream about it
just to try and undermine the conservatives. They
scream because it means they have lost votes from
the elderly who need a prescription drug benefit.

God bless those who stand fast behind the President
to show unity to the world, in time of war. And
shame on the self serving liberals politicians who
would do our country harm to further their agendas
and advance their own personal wealth.

Bart Senior

"Simple Simon" wrote

TIMECNN POLL: Most Registered Voters Would Choose Bush
Fri Nov 21 2003 19:44:24 ET

New York - If the 2004 Presidential election was held today,
registered voters surveyed for TIME/CNN would choose
President George W. Bush over any of the declared Democratic candidates.

In a direct run against Bush, Gen. Wesley Clark fares the best
among registered voters (Clark 42%, Bush 49%), closely followed
by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (Kerry 41%, Bush 49%).

Bush would beat any of three other Democrats, 52 percent to
39 percent, in a direct match: Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt,
Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, or Vermont Gov. Howard
Dean. Against Bush, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards would
lose, 38 percent to 52 percent.

When registered Democrats are asked which Democratic
presidential nominee they would vote for, Dean edges out
Clark 14 percent to 12 percent, followed Lieberman (11%),
Kerry (9%), Gephardt (6%), then Edwards and the Rev. Al
Sharpton (5%).

The TIME/CNN Poll, conducted November 18-19, 2003 by Harris
Interactive, surveyed 1,330 registered voters by telephone.
The margin of error is +/-2.7% points for registered voters,
and +/-4.7% for Democratic voters surveyed for TIME/CNN.

  #10   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bad news for Democrats


Right On, Dude!!!

Democrats are proving lately that they have no desire
to take care of the problems of their loyal base. Democrats
would rather do nothing so the problem of affordable
medicine remains a problem then they can do like they've
been doing for the past fifty years, i.e. claim that they
will solve any and all problems if only they are voted
into power. Yet, they never manage to do anything about
problems because they would rather keep the problems
going so they can continue to say they are the answer
to any and all problems.

So sad for them that President Bush is taking away many
of their favorite issues. Medicare prescription medicine
plan is just another example of Democrat hypocrisy - as
long as they could continue to give it lip service and
accuse the Republicans of attempting to cut benefits,
they were happy. Now that it's being shown how easy
it is to get something done to solve problems they balk.

It's quite pathetic really and one of the main reasons they
are inept, confused and losing power and votes at an
increasing rate. Democrats have put themselves into the
untenable position of good things happening to the country
meaning bad things happening to the Democrat Party.

And they call Mr. Bush dumb. Duh!

S.Simon


"N1EE" wrote in message om...
Have you noticed how ****ed off the liberals are
about the Medicare bill that just passed in the
House of Representatives?

The are ****ed only because it was sponsored by
conservatives. They hate and fear Bush because he
pulls the carpet out under their feet so often.
The liberals sure look funny with no legs to stand on.

Here is a case of a bill they would love, if
they sponsored it, but they have to scream about it
just to try and undermine the conservatives. They
scream because it means they have lost votes from
the elderly who need a prescription drug benefit.

God bless those who stand fast behind the President
to show unity to the world, in time of war. And
shame on the self serving liberals politicians who
would do our country harm to further their agendas
and advance their own personal wealth.

Bart Senior

"Simple Simon" wrote

TIMECNN POLL: Most Registered Voters Would Choose Bush
Fri Nov 21 2003 19:44:24 ET

New York - If the 2004 Presidential election was held today,
registered voters surveyed for TIME/CNN would choose
President George W. Bush over any of the declared Democratic candidates.

In a direct run against Bush, Gen. Wesley Clark fares the best
among registered voters (Clark 42%, Bush 49%), closely followed
by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (Kerry 41%, Bush 49%).

Bush would beat any of three other Democrats, 52 percent to
39 percent, in a direct match: Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt,
Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, or Vermont Gov. Howard
Dean. Against Bush, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards would
lose, 38 percent to 52 percent.

When registered Democrats are asked which Democratic
presidential nominee they would vote for, Dean edges out
Clark 14 percent to 12 percent, followed Lieberman (11%),
Kerry (9%), Gephardt (6%), then Edwards and the Rev. Al
Sharpton (5%).

The TIME/CNN Poll, conducted November 18-19, 2003 by Harris
Interactive, surveyed 1,330 registered voters by telephone.
The margin of error is +/-2.7% points for registered voters,
and +/-4.7% for Democratic voters surveyed for TIME/CNN.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gotta fit this boat in garage, 3" to spare in width. Doable as a practical matter? Mitchell Gossman General 11 February 3rd 04 06:21 AM
What a Great Day! Capt.American ASA 16 July 24th 03 11:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017