No, it's not clear that Neal had anything to do with this, and Bob never
leaves the dock, so it must be true...

"Australian physicists reported that giant methane bubbles, which sometimes
emerge from solid methane deposits under the ocean, can sink ships."

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/afp/20031020/methane.html

I saw this theory demonstrated at least 10 years ago using a model tanker in
a large swimming pool. The ship sunk quickly.
In an unrelated story, gaseous methane has been inexplicably rising from the
ocean floor near Florida's Keys; divers report seeing cedar buckets
littering the area. No boats have been sunk but a few gulls have taken ill.
Scout


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
No, it's not clear that Neal had anything to do with this, and Bob never
leaves the dock, so it must be true...

"Australian physicists reported that giant methane bubbles, which
sometimes
emerge from solid methane deposits under the ocean, can sink ships."

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/afp/20031020/methane.html

Ummm...does anyone here actually read? There are no more ships lost in the
Bermuda triangle (amount of vessels operating in Sq. miles of water) than
anywhere else.

That's a fact you can look up, even though it's not very exciting.

RB

Well, maybe there's methane in the NY area. The evidence is that
you're completely lost at sea.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Ummm...does anyone here actually read? There are no more ships lost in the
Bermuda triangle (amount of vessels operating in Sq. miles of water) than
anywhere else.

That's a fact you can look up, even though it's not very exciting.

RB

He is correct and your response is so typical of what remains of this NG
You cast aspersions upon his good name you cowardly beast you. you
besmirch his integrity whilst hiding like a child behind the dress of the
internet.
Fact is, given the amount of traffic in the "triangle" there is no reason
to break from parcimony; the easy explainations will do.
I fully expect you to pick up your pride and realize you have erred and
will nothing more to say on the subject unless you do it with the respect
and diginty this man deserves............kakkakkakk!!
now go back to sleep and dream of when you actually used to sail.
rick



On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:51:23 -0800, Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Well, maybe there's methane in the NY area. The evidence is that
you're completely lost at sea.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Ummm...does anyone here actually read? There are no more ships lost in
the
Bermuda triangle (amount of vessels operating in Sq. miles of water)
than
anywhere else.

That's a fact you can look up, even though it's not very exciting.

RB





--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Bob never actually sailed.... but he knows all about methane.
He WINS!

"rick" wrote in message
news

He is correct and your response is so typical of what remains of this NG
You cast aspersions upon his good name you cowardly beast you. you
besmirch his integrity whilst hiding like a child behind the dress of the
internet.
Fact is, given the amount of traffic in the "triangle" there is no reason
to break from parcimony; the easy explainations will do.
I fully expect you to pick up your pride and realize you have erred and
will nothing more to say on the subject unless you do it with the respect
and diginty this man deserves............kakkakkakk!!
now go back to sleep and dream of when you actually used to sail.
rick



On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:51:23 -0800, Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Well, maybe there's methane in the NY area. The evidence is that
you're completely lost at sea.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Ummm...does anyone here actually read? There are no more ships lost in
the
Bermuda triangle (amount of vessels operating in Sq. miles of water)
than
anywhere else.

That's a fact you can look up, even though it's not very exciting.

RB





--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

rick wrote:

He is correct and your response is so typical of what remains of this NG
You cast aspersions upon his good name you cowardly beast you. you
besmirch his integrity whilst hiding like a child behind the dress of the
internet.
Fact is, given the amount of traffic in the "triangle" there is no reason
to break from parcimony; the easy explainations will do.
I fully expect you to pick up your pride and realize you have erred and
will nothing more to say on the subject unless you do it with the respect
and diginty this man deserves............kakkakkakk!!
now go back to sleep and dream of when you actually used to sail.
rick

Good God Rick, are you mad? Have you not followed the weeks, nay, months, perhaps
years of vitriol that has been exchanged between Ganz and Booby? Why should you expect
the leopard to change his spots in this instance?

You are however correct about the veracity of the Boobster's claim in this case, were
it otherwise (the risk that is) Lloyds would require additional premiums for policies
covering vessels intending to ply those waters and such is not the case.

Cheers
Marty

Years for sure... I remember when booby was actually fairly normal.
He showed up one day, said he was a novice, and had something
interesting to say. I guess that was before his home confinement,
due to either legal or health problems. Now, he just a bloated, loudmouth,
egotistical slob, who has no life outside of his cheapo entertainment
system.
He's still a novice when it comes to sailing, and probably sits on his fat
ass on his wife's boat, sometimes with his wife, sometimes not. He's turned
into a thief and a liar, usually claiming that he is the best at this or
that, but
generally at just about everything. It's unclear how he gets other women
besides his wife to motor around with him. Judging from the pictures, they
appear to be either stupid or bored. Some are uglier than others. His
sailing
skills are, to say the least, limited. Even with all his fancy garbage, he
knows
so little about sailing that he rarely ventures much beyond his own marina.
Mostly, he's a hazard to navigation and to those who happen to be on the
boat with him.

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
rick wrote:

He is correct and your response is so typical of what remains of this NG
You cast aspersions upon his good name you cowardly beast you. you
besmirch his integrity whilst hiding like a child behind the dress of
the
internet.
Fact is, given the amount of traffic in the "triangle" there is no
reason
to break from parcimony; the easy explainations will do.
I fully expect you to pick up your pride and realize you have erred and
will nothing more to say on the subject unless you do it with the
respect
and diginty this man deserves............kakkakkakk!!
now go back to sleep and dream of when you actually used to sail.
rick

Good God Rick, are you mad? Have you not followed the weeks, nay, months,
perhaps
years of vitriol that has been exchanged between Ganz and Booby? Why
should you expect
the leopard to change his spots in this instance?

You are however correct about the veracity of the Boobster's claim in this
case, were
it otherwise (the risk that is) Lloyds would require additional premiums
for policies
covering vessels intending to ply those waters and such is not the case.

Cheers
Marty

Even with all his fancy garbage, he
knows
so little about sailing

Still waiting for that list of yours, Ganzy! Show us you actually know
something!

Bwahahahahaha!

RB

You're the one who KNOWS EVERYTHING ABOUT EVERYTHING...
including theft and lying.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Even with all his fancy garbage, he
knows
so little about sailing

Still waiting for that list of yours, Ganzy! Show us you actually know
something!

Bwahahahahaha!

RB