Well, no doubt! What's your IQ again? snicker

LP


Mensa

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:01:55 -0500, Horvath wrote:
snip
it would be contrary to Canadian Law to bring them into Canadian waters.

What are they going to do to you? They have to catch you first.
..


Screw the rules! They're more like guidelines, anyways.

the world is a very different place post 911...you'd think you were the
only people ever to have suffered...oh wait, that was the jews. anyway,
handguns and non-disclosed weapons are on a zero=toerance list...just like
pot is there...same penalty....life in prison...death in Texas.

zero tolerance for pot? what frickin country are you talking about?

"none" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:01:55 -0500, Horvath wrote:
snip
it would be contrary to Canadian Law to bring them into Canadian
waters.

What are they going to do to you? They have to catch you first.
.


Screw the rules! They're more like guidelines, anyways.

the world is a very different place post 911...you'd think you were the
only people ever to have suffered...oh wait, that was the jews. anyway,
handguns and non-disclosed weapons are on a zero=toerance list...just like
pot is there...same penalty....life in prison...death in Texas.

the USA. I don't even smoke so i have no unterior motive in stating thus.
Matter of fact, zero tolerance for most of the rest of the world as well,
but thats another issue. I m i anot slander american people, we're all
essentially the same breed..It is policy makers that seem to change
according to the season/.
IMHO.
rick

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:57:19 -0500, Scott Vernon wrote:

zero tolerance for pot? what frickin country are you talking about?

snip

JAXAshby wrote:

the 12 ga you can get a permit to bring in. the pistol, too, if the barrel is
long enough.


No, you can't

Cheers
Marty

In English that means sub-par.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
Well, no doubt! What's your IQ again? snicker

LP


Mensa

"none" wrote

...... The stats indicate that armed people are far more likely
to get hurt or killed by ther own weapons. .....

Only police (c: AFAIK the only "study" indicating this was a wash
promulgated by Sarah Brady's nut group. They found ONE obscure rural US
county in which there had been one justifiable homicide and 47 suicides
since the county began keeping records. From these dubious data they deduced
that you're "47 times more likely" to be killed by your own gun than to
defend yourself with it. This deduction ASSumes that the rest of the world's
experiences match that one county and that guns are never used defensively
unless someone is justifiably killed. Both are patently ridiculous but the
idiot press still drags out this lie when convenient. Every broadbased, and
thus statistically valid study shows just the opposite.

http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/faq2.htm:

US Federal law provides a person, who is not prohibited by the GCA from
receiving or transporting firearms, the right to transport a firearm under
certain conditions, notwithstanding state or local law to the contrary. The
firearms must be unloaded and in a locked trunk or, in a vehicle lacking a
trunk, in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.
Also, the carrying and possession must be lawful at the place of origin and
destination. [18 U. S. C. 926A, 27 CFR 178.38] 9.

Unfortunately many states' police resent this and will instead arrest you
for having that big bag of coke you didn't know you had, not to mention the
explosives and kiddy porn and ......

the 12 ga you can get a permit to bring in. the pistol, too, if the barrel
is
long enough.


No, you can't

Cheers
Marty


here ya go dude.

http://www.cfc-ccaf.gc.ca/en/owners_...ts/visitin.asp

that's a start. that site doesn't mention protection from wildlife, but the
canadian site does. I just didn't spend any time looking for it.

never been here, eh?


"none" wrote in message
news
the USA. I don't even smoke so i have no unterior motive in stating thus.
Matter of fact, zero tolerance for most of the rest of the world as well,
but thats another issue. I m i anot slander american people, we're all
essentially the same breed..It is policy makers that seem to change
according to the season/.
IMHO.
rick

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:57:19 -0500, Scott Vernon
wrote:

zero tolerance for pot? what frickin country are you talking about?

snip

it is interesting to note that the IQ is used to describe deficits in
intelegence...for reason snobs thought that being less deficiant than some
others was an atribute...so they started a club for those less challanged
than the bulk of society...looks good on them.
APFs.
rick

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:09:12 -0800, Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

In English that means sub-par.




--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/