Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Economic freedom is the measure of the roadblocks governments put in place
that prevent their citizens from achieving success. Not surprisingly, countries with the greatest economic freedom enjoy strong economic growth. Unfree countries, conversely, do not. Long a symbol of economic prosperity, America for the first time no longer ranks among the top 10 free nations of the world, according to The 2005 Index of Economic Freedom, just released by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal. Now in its 11th edition, the Index is the most up-to-date and comprehensive source of data on taxes, tariffs, regulations, monetary policy, and the burden of government around the world. Out-of-control government spending is partly to blame for America's standing, but so is competition, writes Heritage's Marc Miles in his introduction. "The U.S. is resting on its laurels," he explains, "while innovative countries around the world are changing their approaches and reducing roadblocks." The U.S. must make a choice, concludes Miles. "Is it to remain the symbol of economic freedom in the world that was, or is it going to take the steps needed to regain the leadership in the world that is and will be?" http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/ All thanks to junior! John Cairns |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:57:35 +0000, John Cairns wrote:
Economic freedom is the measure of the roadblocks governments put in place that prevent their citizens from achieving success. Not surprisingly, countries with the greatest economic freedom enjoy strong economic growth. Unfree countries, conversely, do not. Long a symbol of economic prosperity, America for the first time no longer ranks among the top 10 free nations of the world, according to The 2005 Index of Economic Freedom, just released by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal. We are still some ways from the "Land of the Once Free", but our direction is clear. http://www.rsf.fr/article.php3?id_article=4116 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't see anything about gun ownership. If you factor that in, the US
would move back up to number 1. "John Cairns" wrote Economic freedom is the measure of the roadblocks governments put in place that prevent their citizens from achieving success. Not surprisingly, countries with the greatest economic freedom enjoy strong economic growth. Unfree countries, conversely, do not. Long a symbol of economic prosperity, America for the first time no longer ranks among the top 10 free nations of the world, according to The 2005 Index of Economic Freedom, just released by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal. Now in its 11th edition, the Index is the most up-to-date and comprehensive source of data on taxes, tariffs, regulations, monetary policy, and the burden of government around the world. Out-of-control government spending is partly to blame for America's standing, but so is competition, writes Heritage's Marc Miles in his introduction. "The U.S. is resting on its laurels," he explains, "while innovative countries around the world are changing their approaches and reducing roadblocks." The U.S. must make a choice, concludes Miles. "Is it to remain the symbol of economic freedom in the world that was, or is it going to take the steps needed to regain the leadership in the world that is and will be?" http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/ All thanks to junior! John Cairns |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't realistically base the degree of freedom on the right to carry a
deadly weapon.... no matter how much I agree with the fact that freedom to carry should be available..... it's the will of the majority that denotes a democratic state. You do have the right to move to an area that allows it..... but that area may require to sacrifice other freedoms to allow the one you seek. CM "Bart Senior" wrote in message ... I didn't see anything about gun ownership. If you factor that in, the US would move back up to number 1. "John Cairns" wrote Economic freedom is the measure of the roadblocks governments put in place that prevent their citizens from achieving success. Not surprisingly, countries with the greatest economic freedom enjoy strong economic growth. Unfree countries, conversely, do not. Long a symbol of economic prosperity, America for the first time no longer ranks among the top 10 free nations of the world, according to The 2005 Index of Economic Freedom, just released by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal. Now in its 11th edition, the Index is the most up-to-date and comprehensive source of data on taxes, tariffs, regulations, monetary policy, and the burden of government around the world. Out-of-control government spending is partly to blame for America's standing, but so is competition, writes Heritage's Marc Miles in his introduction. "The U.S. is resting on its laurels," he explains, "while innovative countries around the world are changing their approaches and reducing roadblocks." The U.S. must make a choice, concludes Miles. "Is it to remain the symbol of economic freedom in the world that was, or is it going to take the steps needed to regain the leadership in the world that is and will be?" http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/ All thanks to junior! John Cairns |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CM,
Our "Pledge's" 2nd sentence tell what kind of a government we have It Is a REPUBLIC. It is a Democratic Republic and has been a pretty successful Republic of the people for a very long time. In our time there has been a change taking place. It was never meant to be the private life time career for politicians. Career Politician have gain enough control to become Rulers rather than Representatives. As long as they can vote themselves wage increases, it becomes a damn good job. Jefferson envisioned a government modeled after the Greeks (Spartan) to be exact, which elected representatives had to take turns serving, if elected. They then returned to their private lives after serving. Geo Washington did set an example when he voluntarily stepped down after serving. This did, kind of, set the tone for sometime. Time for me to get off the soap box. Think about when and why Colleges started teaching Political Science as a Degree. Ole Thom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More bad news for Bush, good news for Americans | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
A truly great man! | ASA | |||
Bush Resume | ASA |