If a raghead was out in front of your house dousing your car with petrol to
be set on fire, wouldn't a suitable response be a well aimed discharge from
a high powered rifle?

Unhindered private ownership of firearms is a major step in combating
terrorism.

Free men own guns!

Amen!

Great gun thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1517898/posts


"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
k.net...
If a raghead was out in front of your house dousing your car with petrol
to
be set on fire, wouldn't a suitable response be a well aimed discharge
from
a high powered rifle?

Unhindered private ownership of firearms is a major step in combating
terrorism.

Free men own guns!

Amen!

"Bob Crantz" wrote ..
If a raghead was out in front of your house dousing your car with petrol
to
be set on fire, wouldn't a suitable response be a well aimed discharge
from
a high powered rifle?

Naw - overkill. A quiet subsonic .22 to the head would do at that range
would do.

I dunno about France but if a rioter torches your car in the US your
insurance doesn't cover it.

Great idea! Plus kids can easily handle the .22!

Amen!

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Bob Crantz" wrote ..
If a raghead was out in front of your house dousing your car with petrol
to
be set on fire, wouldn't a suitable response be a well aimed discharge
from
a high powered rifle?

Naw - overkill. A quiet subsonic .22 to the head would do at that range
would do.

I dunno about France but if a rioter torches your car in the US your
insurance doesn't cover it.

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
k.net...
If a raghead was out in front of your house dousing your car
with petrol to
be set on fire, wouldn't a suitable response be a well aimed
discharge from
a high powered rifle?


No. A more suitable response would be to knock him out, tie him
up, wait till he comes to, then douse him with fire and give him
a cigarette.

SBV

" Unhindered private ownership of firearms is a major step in combating
terrorism."

I gotta hand it to the people who still believe that sort of thing.
No matter how badly the peace in Iraq is going, they still think that
making a half a million soldiers suddenly unemployed - **and letting them
keep thier weapons** - was a good idea.

Tell that to the Swiss.

Worked well against Hitler.

Amen!

"Steve Thomas" wrote in message
...

" Unhindered private ownership of firearms is a major step in combating
terrorism."

I gotta hand it to the people who still believe that sort of thing.
No matter how badly the peace in Iraq is going, they still think that
making a half a million soldiers suddenly unemployed - **and letting them
keep thier weapons** - was a good idea.

Criminals own more guns than free men and know how to use them better!
Let the government get the gun away from criminals.



http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage

Bob Crantz wrote:
Great gun thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1517898/posts


Most of the guys posting in this thread are pretty stupid IMHO.
They're arguing over what kind of SLR to use to hold a mob away from
their house?

1- how many of these guys would really shoot into a crowd
2- what are the police going to do later
3- they seem to have missed the fact that the French police are having
trouble with these rioters because they are armed, too

Among the few that have a lick of sense is the guy who said "you also
need a movement plan" which says to me that he's realized that even if
you do chase away a crowd of rioters by shooting some of them, they'll
be back later... probably madder & more motivated, and better armed too.

IMHO a far more likely scenario is that Mr Gun Thread Poster leans out
the window waving his big fancy gun, threatening to shoot, until one of
the mob yanks it away from him. Or, if any shooting occurs, gets
arrested and put in a nice safe jail (and the mob burns his house while
he's away)... or he gets shot by an armed rioter.

There is no weapon more powerful than thinking ahead.

DSK

Bingo Doug!

They are idiots. FreeRepublic is full of them and they don't have a
monopoly.

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Bob Crantz wrote:
Great gun thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1517898/posts


Most of the guys posting in this thread are pretty stupid IMHO.
They're arguing over what kind of SLR to use to hold a mob away from
their house?

1- how many of these guys would really shoot into a crowd
2- what are the police going to do later
3- they seem to have missed the fact that the French police are having
trouble with these rioters because they are armed, too

Among the few that have a lick of sense is the guy who said "you also
need a movement plan" which says to me that he's realized that even if
you do chase away a crowd of rioters by shooting some of them, they'll
be back later... probably madder & more motivated, and better armed too.

IMHO a far more likely scenario is that Mr Gun Thread Poster leans out
the window waving his big fancy gun, threatening to shoot, until one of
the mob yanks it away from him. Or, if any shooting occurs, gets
arrested and put in a nice safe jail (and the mob burns his house while
he's away)... or he gets shot by an armed rioter.

There is no weapon more powerful than thinking ahead.

DSK