http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita.../iran-next.jpg

1. Airstrikes on all Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps,
believed to control Iran's nuclear and missile programs.nuke sites.

2. Airstrikes on all conventional weapons sites.

3. Airstrikes at our leasure with UAV until they say UNCLE.

Lets stay off the ground in this one.

Let the Navy flex it's might.

Iran has it coming, even Jimmy Carter would be happy to pop off a few
rounds in Tehran.

Capt. American

Hey CA,

Glad to hear from you.
The Coal tip is paying off big time, but I guess you know that:0)
I wonder if Doug took your advice?

Good advice on Iran. The new leader of Iran is asking for it.
Maybe the folks in Isreal will take care of them, or Tony Blair he's
pretty ****ed offed! ;0)

And your right we should stay off the ground in Iran, to many of em.

You back from Greece ?

Joe

Hey Donal

Do you believe the leader of Iran when he says the holocaust never
happened?
Is he a good guy just getting bad US press?

Joe

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Capt.American" wrote in message
ups.com...
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita.../iran-next.jpg

1. Airstrikes on all Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps,
believed to control Iran's nuclear and missile programs.nuke sites.

Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear technology?

Why shouldn't Al qaeda?

Are you worried that their lunatic President might launch an illegal war?

It might be illegal, but brief.

Max

I can no longer sit back and allow Islamic infiltration, Islamic
indoctrination, Islamic subversion and the international Islamic conspiracy
to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Yes gentlemen, they are on their way in, and nobody can bring them back. For
the sake of our country, and our way of life, I suggest you get the rest of
SAC in after them. Otherwise, we will be totally destroyed by Raghead
retaliation. Uh, my boys will give you the best kind of start, 1400 megatons
worth, and you sure as hell won't stop them now, uhuh. Uh, so let's get
going, there's no other choice. God willing, we will prevail, in peace and
freedom from fear, and in true health, through the purity and essence of our
natural... fluids. God bless you all,

Amen!

"Donal" wrote
Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear technology?

Same reason your government doesn't allow you to have certain firearms????

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
ink.net...
I can no longer sit back and allow Islamic infiltration, Islamic
indoctrination, Islamic subversion and the international Islamic conspiracy
to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

:Maj. Bat Guano

Yes gentlemen, they are on their way in, and nobody can bring them back.
For the sake of our country, and our way of life, I suggest you get the
rest of SAC in after them. Otherwise, we will be totally destroyed by
Raghead retaliation. Uh, my boys will give you the best kind of start,
1400 megatons worth, and you sure as hell won't stop them now, uhuh. Uh,
so let's get going, there's no other choice. God willing, we will prevail,
in peace and freedom from fear, and in true health, through the purity and
essence of our natural... fluids. God bless you all,

Ve vill require many nubile females.

: Dr. Strangelove

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Donal" wrote
Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear technology?

Same reason your government doesn't allow you to have certain firearms????

That is because my government wants to prevent the killing of innocent
civilians.

Only one country has ever used nuclear weapons to kill innocent civilians.
Was that Iran???




Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Donal" wrote
Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear technology?

Same reason your government doesn't allow you to have certain
firearms????

That is because my government wants to prevent the killing of innocent
civilians.

Hmmm. Perhaps they should have outlawed car bombs, then.

Only one country has ever used nuclear weapons to kill innocent civilians.
Was that Iran???

What is more important to you?: what method is used to kill innocent
civilians, or that innocent civilians are killed?

Max

"Donal" wrote
Only one country has ever used nuclear weapons to kill innocent civilians.
Was that Iran???

Actually, no country has ever used nuc's to kill INNOCENT civilians.

In Europe, most civilians stayed out of the fighting and this were not
intentionally killed, altho more were killed by conventional bombing there than
by 'nucs in Japan. Those who took part, partisans and guerillas, were. The
Geneva Convention specifically addresses them and exempts them from rights
granted POWs. That's the basis for current US treatment of partisans captured in
Afghanistan and Iraq.

As the US island-hopped closer to Japan we found ever larger civilian Japanese
populations. True to their code, these 'civilians' fought us tooth and nail -
sometimes committing suicide to avoid surrender. In many ways they were a
greater danger than Japan's uniformed troops. Japan's leaders had always called
upon all Japanese, civilian and military alike to "defend the Emperor" to their
dying breaths and the civilians encountered on Guadlecanal, et cetera, gave us
every reason to believe those on the home islands would do exactly that. Thus
the decision to treat them as partisans instead of civilians and drop the bombs.

But remember, were I in charge, one of Iran's top-secret nuclear experiments
would go horribly awry in killing most if not all of their radical leadership.
Naturally some would accuse the US as some Soviets did over Chernoble and Kurst
but you know how they lie grin. Same thing could happen in North Korea.
Everybody know it's dangerous for inexperienced people to play with bombs.