| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Oh Canada!?
There's even worse!
Just think or being exposed to an unshielded fission reaction where the reaction products bombard your body andyour skin burns in a matter of minutes to an hour and longer term exposure results in cancer. The sun should be outlawed! Amen! OzOne wrote in message ... Canadian Uni hot under the collar over Wi-Fi safety Tin-foil hats all round By John Leyden Published Wednesday 22nd February 2006 15:18 GMT Get breaking Reg news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how A Canadian university has limited Wi-Fi networks on campus, not out of information security concerns, but because the long-term safety of the technology is "unproven". Fred Gilbert, president of Canada's Lakehead University, made the order on the basis of possible health risk from the technology, especially to young people. Inconclusive studies into possible links between radio transmissions and leukemia and brain tumors from, among others, scientists for the California Public Utilities Commission, led Gilbert to make the "precautionary ban". "All I'm saying is while the jury's out on this one, I'm not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students. Admittedly that's highest around the locations of the antenna sites and the wireless hot spots, but those are the places people tend to gravitate to because they get the best reception," Gilbert said, Canadian technology website IT Business reports. The Ontario University makes limited use of WiFi only in areas where fibre-optics links can't reach. Gilbert says he want to see conclusive evidence that the technology is safe before he'll be prepared to approve its wider use. Robert Bradley, director of consumer and clinical radiation protection at Health Canada, said documents due to be published this year should establish that WiFi networks operating at below current regulatory limits poses no risk to humans. But if the controversy about the possible health risks of mobile phones are anything to go by that's unlikely to reassure everyone. Jorg-Rudiger Sack, a computer science professor at Carleton University, said that while wireless is useful in environments where people are not likely to be working in fixed locations (such as airport departure lounges) its benefits in campus environments are far more tenuous. ® Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Oh Canada!?
I know a guy who's still afraid to use a micro wave oven.
Scotty "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... There's even worse! Just think or being exposed to an unshielded fission reaction where the reaction products bombard your body andyour skin burns in a matter of minutes to an hour and longer term exposure results in cancer. The sun should be outlawed! Amen! OzOne wrote in message ... Canadian Uni hot under the collar over Wi-Fi safety Tin-foil hats all round By John Leyden Published Wednesday 22nd February 2006 15:18 GMT Get breaking Reg news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how A Canadian university has limited Wi-Fi networks on campus, not out of information security concerns, but because the long-term safety of the technology is "unproven". Fred Gilbert, president of Canada's Lakehead University, made the order on the basis of possible health risk from the technology, especially to young people. Inconclusive studies into possible links between radio transmissions and leukemia and brain tumors from, among others, scientists for the California Public Utilities Commission, led Gilbert to make the "precautionary ban". "All I'm saying is while the jury's out on this one, I'm not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students. Admittedly that's highest around the locations of the antenna sites and the wireless hot spots, but those are the places people tend to gravitate to because they get the best reception," Gilbert said, Canadian technology website IT Business reports. The Ontario University makes limited use of WiFi only in areas where fibre-optics links can't reach. Gilbert says he want to see conclusive evidence that the technology is safe before he'll be prepared to approve its wider use. Robert Bradley, director of consumer and clinical radiation protection at Health Canada, said documents due to be published this year should establish that WiFi networks operating at below current regulatory limits poses no risk to humans. But if the controversy about the possible health risks of mobile phones are anything to go by that's unlikely to reassure everyone. Jorg-Rudiger Sack, a computer science professor at Carleton University, said that while wireless is useful in environments where people are not likely to be working in fixed locations (such as airport departure lounges) its benefits in campus environments are far more tenuous. ® Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Oh Canada!?
There's reason to be extremely afraid.
Ever notice that heated water from the microwave never boils until you throw in salt, sugar or a teabag? That's because the latent heat of vaporization is bound in an intra molecular resonance state (very similar to Einstein-Bose condensates) until a singularity is introduced. Then the energy is rapidly released with violent boiling. Unfortunately, not all the water is released from the resonance state. You drink some of this heated fluid and it causes nanoscale resonances with body tissue, much the same way prions mutant other prions to cause Jacob-Krutzfeld disease (mad cow to you Scotty). In other words, microwaved water causes cancer. Avoid it. Amen! "Scotty" wrote in message ... I know a guy who's still afraid to use a micro wave oven. Scotty "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... There's even worse! Just think or being exposed to an unshielded fission reaction where the reaction products bombard your body andyour skin burns in a matter of minutes to an hour and longer term exposure results in cancer. The sun should be outlawed! Amen! OzOne wrote in message ... Canadian Uni hot under the collar over Wi-Fi safety Tin-foil hats all round By John Leyden Published Wednesday 22nd February 2006 15:18 GMT Get breaking Reg news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how A Canadian university has limited Wi-Fi networks on campus, not out of information security concerns, but because the long-term safety of the technology is "unproven". Fred Gilbert, president of Canada's Lakehead University, made the order on the basis of possible health risk from the technology, especially to young people. Inconclusive studies into possible links between radio transmissions and leukemia and brain tumors from, among others, scientists for the California Public Utilities Commission, led Gilbert to make the "precautionary ban". "All I'm saying is while the jury's out on this one, I'm not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students. Admittedly that's highest around the locations of the antenna sites and the wireless hot spots, but those are the places people tend to gravitate to because they get the best reception," Gilbert said, Canadian technology website IT Business reports. The Ontario University makes limited use of WiFi only in areas where fibre-optics links can't reach. Gilbert says he want to see conclusive evidence that the technology is safe before he'll be prepared to approve its wider use. Robert Bradley, director of consumer and clinical radiation protection at Health Canada, said documents due to be published this year should establish that WiFi networks operating at below current regulatory limits poses no risk to humans. But if the controversy about the possible health risks of mobile phones are anything to go by that's unlikely to reassure everyone. Jorg-Rudiger Sack, a computer science professor at Carleton University, said that while wireless is useful in environments where people are not likely to be working in fixed locations (such as airport departure lounges) its benefits in campus environments are far more tenuous. ® Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Oh Canada!?
I call bull****! I heated some water tonight for my wife's
tea and it was boiling when I took it out of the MW, before I put the tea bag in. Mad cow, or mad scientist? Scotty "Bob Crantz" wrote in message . net... There's reason to be extremely afraid. Ever notice that heated water from the microwave never boils until you throw in salt, sugar or a teabag? That's because the latent heat of vaporization is bound in an intra molecular resonance state (very similar to Einstein-Bose condensates) until a singularity is introduced. Then the energy is rapidly released with violent boiling. Unfortunately, not all the water is released from the resonance state. You drink some of this heated fluid and it causes nanoscale resonances with body tissue, much the same way prions mutant other prions to cause Jacob-Krutzfeld disease (mad cow to you Scotty). In other words, microwaved water causes cancer. Avoid it. Amen! "Scotty" wrote in message ... I know a guy who's still afraid to use a micro wave oven. Scotty "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... There's even worse! Just think or being exposed to an unshielded fission reaction where the reaction products bombard your body andyour skin burns in a matter of minutes to an hour and longer term exposure results in cancer. The sun should be outlawed! Amen! OzOne wrote in message ... Canadian Uni hot under the collar over Wi-Fi safety Tin-foil hats all round By John Leyden Published Wednesday 22nd February 2006 15:18 GMT Get breaking Reg news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how A Canadian university has limited Wi-Fi networks on campus, not out of information security concerns, but because the long-term safety of the technology is "unproven". Fred Gilbert, president of Canada's Lakehead University, made the order on the basis of possible health risk from the technology, especially to young people. Inconclusive studies into possible links between radio transmissions and leukemia and brain tumors from, among others, scientists for the California Public Utilities Commission, led Gilbert to make the "precautionary ban". "All I'm saying is while the jury's out on this one, I'm not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students. Admittedly that's highest around the locations of the antenna sites and the wireless hot spots, but those are the places people tend to gravitate to because they get the best reception," Gilbert said, Canadian technology website IT Business reports. The Ontario University makes limited use of WiFi only in areas where fibre-optics links can't reach. Gilbert says he want to see conclusive evidence that the technology is safe before he'll be prepared to approve its wider use. Robert Bradley, director of consumer and clinical radiation protection at Health Canada, said documents due to be published this year should establish that WiFi networks operating at below current regulatory limits poses no risk to humans. But if the controversy about the possible health risks of mobile phones are anything to go by that's unlikely to reassure everyone. Jorg-Rudiger Sack, a computer science professor at Carleton University, said that while wireless is useful in environments where people are not likely to be working in fixed locations (such as airport departure lounges) its benefits in campus environments are far more tenuous. ® Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Oh Canada!?
"Scotty" wrote in message ... I call bull****! I heated some water tonight for my wife's tea and it was boiling when I took it out of the MW, before I put the tea bag in. Mad cow, or mad scientist? Neither, just hard water or worse. Drink up! Are you on a well? |
Oh Canada!?
|
Oh Canada!?
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message . net... "Scotty" wrote in message ... I call bull****! I heated some water tonight for my wife's tea and it was boiling when I took it out of the MW, before I put the tea bag in. Mad cow, or mad scientist? Neither, just hard water or worse. Drink up! Are you on a well? Well, yes, of course. Scotty |
Oh Canada!?
oh, that 'splains it, all our coffee mugs have cracks and
scratches. SV "Bob Crantz" wrote in message . net... http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/superheating.html |
Oh Canada!?
Bob,
Last time I looked, the sun was a Fusion reaction. But, you are correct, it is much too dangerous for common people to dael with. Exposure should only be available with a doctor's precscription and very carefully monitored for abuse. Matt Colie Bob Crantz wrote: There's even worse! Just think or being exposed to an unshielded fission reaction where the reaction products bombard your body andyour skin burns in a matter of minutes to an hour and longer term exposure results in cancer. The sun should be outlawed! Amen! OzOne wrote in message ... Canadian Uni hot under the collar over Wi-Fi safety Tin-foil hats all round By John Leyden Published Wednesday 22nd February 2006 15:18 GMT Get breaking Reg news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how A Canadian university has limited Wi-Fi networks on campus, not out of information security concerns, but because the long-term safety of the technology is "unproven". Fred Gilbert, president of Canada's Lakehead University, made the order on the basis of possible health risk from the technology, especially to young people. Inconclusive studies into possible links between radio transmissions and leukemia and brain tumors from, among others, scientists for the California Public Utilities Commission, led Gilbert to make the "precautionary ban". "All I'm saying is while the jury's out on this one, I'm not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students. Admittedly that's highest around the locations of the antenna sites and the wireless hot spots, but those are the places people tend to gravitate to because they get the best reception," Gilbert said, Canadian technology website IT Business reports. The Ontario University makes limited use of WiFi only in areas where fibre-optics links can't reach. Gilbert says he want to see conclusive evidence that the technology is safe before he'll be prepared to approve its wider use. Robert Bradley, director of consumer and clinical radiation protection at Health Canada, said documents due to be published this year should establish that WiFi networks operating at below current regulatory limits poses no risk to humans. But if the controversy about the possible health risks of mobile phones are anything to go by that's unlikely to reassure everyone. Jorg-Rudiger Sack, a computer science professor at Carleton University, said that while wireless is useful in environments where people are not likely to be working in fixed locations (such as airport departure lounges) its benefits in campus environments are far more tenuous. ® Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
Oh Canada!?
You are correct Matt about the fusion.
Bless you my son! Amen! "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Bob, Last time I looked, the sun was a Fusion reaction. But, you are correct, it is much too dangerous for common people to dael with. Exposure should only be available with a doctor's precscription and very carefully monitored for abuse. Matt Colie Bob Crantz wrote: There's even worse! Just think or being exposed to an unshielded fission reaction where the reaction products bombard your body andyour skin burns in a matter of minutes to an hour and longer term exposure results in cancer. The sun should be outlawed! Amen! OzOne wrote in message ... Canadian Uni hot under the collar over Wi-Fi safety Tin-foil hats all round By John Leyden Published Wednesday 22nd February 2006 15:18 GMT Get breaking Reg news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how A Canadian university has limited Wi-Fi networks on campus, not out of information security concerns, but because the long-term safety of the technology is "unproven". Fred Gilbert, president of Canada's Lakehead University, made the order on the basis of possible health risk from the technology, especially to young people. Inconclusive studies into possible links between radio transmissions and leukemia and brain tumors from, among others, scientists for the California Public Utilities Commission, led Gilbert to make the "precautionary ban". "All I'm saying is while the jury's out on this one, I'm not going to put in place what is potential chronic exposure for our students. Admittedly that's highest around the locations of the antenna sites and the wireless hot spots, but those are the places people tend to gravitate to because they get the best reception," Gilbert said, Canadian technology website IT Business reports. The Ontario University makes limited use of WiFi only in areas where fibre-optics links can't reach. Gilbert says he want to see conclusive evidence that the technology is safe before he'll be prepared to approve its wider use. Robert Bradley, director of consumer and clinical radiation protection at Health Canada, said documents due to be published this year should establish that WiFi networks operating at below current regulatory limits poses no risk to humans. But if the controversy about the possible health risks of mobile phones are anything to go by that's unlikely to reassure everyone. Jorg-Rudiger Sack, a computer science professor at Carleton University, said that while wireless is useful in environments where people are not likely to be working in fixed locations (such as airport departure lounges) its benefits in campus environments are far more tenuous. ® Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:29 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com