Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
has a Hunter 33.5. Is that a "bad boat"?
Thanks, LP |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lady Pilot wrote:
has a Hunter 33.5. Is that a "bad boat"? No such thing as a bad boat. Some are better than others. The 33.5 is the smallest of the Hunter "Legend" series of racer-cruisers and they are roomy for their size & fast for their roominess. How can that be bad? DSK |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message ... Lady Pilot wrote: has a Hunter 33.5. Is that a "bad boat"? No such thing as a bad boat. Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Max |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:55:47 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote: "DSK" wrote in message . .. Lady Pilot wrote: has a Hunter 33.5. Is that a "bad boat"? No such thing as a bad boat. Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Max Hey now, I logged about 500 miles on a 44' custom built ferro-cement, pilot house ketch, on a delivery crew. Wasn't so bad. Frank |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No such thing as a bad boat.
Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Frank Boettcher wrote: Hey now, I logged about 500 miles on a 44' custom built ferro-cement, pilot house ketch, on a delivery crew. Wasn't so bad. He didn't say that *all* ferro-cement boats were horrid abortions. Some are great, I knew a man in Florida with a 40' pinky schooner... the only one of that type I've ever sailed... built out of ferro-cement. A few rough spots on the hull but it was a great boat. After thinking it over, I would have to say that there is such a thing as a bad boat after all... ones that never fulfill their basic function. Of coourse, in many cases it's not really the boats fault. DSK |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:53:05 -0400, DSK wrote:
No such thing as a bad boat. Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Frank Boettcher wrote: Hey now, I logged about 500 miles on a 44' custom built ferro-cement, pilot house ketch, on a delivery crew. Wasn't so bad. He didn't say that *all* ferro-cement boats were horrid abortions. Yes, I know. Years ago, guy in the slip next to me had a ferro-cement double ender he built himself. He motored, less spars and rig, down the Mississippi River from somewhere up north, with the intention of fitting out and heading south. Had a pregnant wife and a Newfoundland dog. Waited for the wife to deliver, then after fitting out they headed out. I had serious doubts about the boat, particularly the chain plate design. They made it about half way across the Gulf and hit a storm, were dismasted, rescued by a freighter, but the boat sank in tow. Never saw them again, I guess they went back up north. Felt sorry for him, I'm fairly sure you can't get those home built ferro-cement boats insured. But the one I helped deliver was nice with the exception of a very serous weather helm problem. And I guess Capn Rob is right. If you are going to own sub standard boats, you should never get out of sight of land. Frank Some are great, I knew a man in Florida with a 40' pinky schooner... the only one of that type I've ever sailed... built out of ferro-cement. A few rough spots on the hull but it was a great boat. After thinking it over, I would have to say that there is such a thing as a bad boat after all... ones that never fulfill their basic function. Of coourse, in many cases it's not really the boats fault. DSK |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:55:47 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote: "DSK" wrote in message .. . Lady Pilot wrote: has a Hunter 33.5. Is that a "bad boat"? No such thing as a bad boat. Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Max Hey now, I logged about 500 miles on a 44' custom built ferro-cement, pilot house ketch, on a delivery crew. Wasn't so bad. I wasn't impugning ferro-cement, rather just some of the "creations" that have been fashioned from it. I saw one beautiful f-c boat a few years back, but most have been so ugly that they had to sneak up on the ocean to get wet. Max |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:53:05 -0400, DSK wrote: No such thing as a bad boat. Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Frank Boettcher wrote: Hey now, I logged about 500 miles on a 44' custom built ferro-cement, pilot house ketch, on a delivery crew. Wasn't so bad. He didn't say that *all* ferro-cement boats were horrid abortions. Yes, I know. Years ago, guy in the slip next to me had a ferro-cement double ender he built himself. He motored, less spars and rig, down the Mississippi River from somewhere up north, with the intention of fitting out and heading south. Had a pregnant wife and a Newfoundland dog. Waited for the wife to deliver, then after fitting out they headed out. I had serious doubts about the boat, particularly the chain plate design. They made it about half way across the Gulf and hit a storm, were dismasted, rescued by a freighter, but the boat sank in tow. Never saw them again, I guess they went back up north. Felt sorry for him, I'm fairly sure you can't get those home built ferro-cement boats insured. That may have been the story I saw in SOUNDINGS a while back. The boat literally fell apart underway. I thought the people had bought it, however, rather than built it. But it's been too long to remember details. At any rate it was a "floating" death trap. The family survived, but lost everything. Max |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:59:18 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:55:47 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote: "DSK" wrote in message . .. Lady Pilot wrote: has a Hunter 33.5. Is that a "bad boat"? No such thing as a bad boat. Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Max Hey now, I logged about 500 miles on a 44' custom built ferro-cement, pilot house ketch, on a delivery crew. Wasn't so bad. I wasn't impugning ferro-cement, rather just some of the "creations" that have been fashioned from it. I saw one beautiful f-c boat a few years back, but most have been so ugly that they had to sneak up on the ocean to get wet. Max Don't think I would ever trust one if I wasn't present during the molding process. A continuously wet monolithic and homogeneous mold operation is an absolute necessity and probably rarely occurs. However, if done right, I'm led to believe that they get stronger every year they are in the water. Frank |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:59:18 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:55:47 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... Lady Pilot wrote: has a Hunter 33.5. Is that a "bad boat"? No such thing as a bad boat. Not so sure about that. A few of the horrid ferro-cement abortions I've seen during my life probably qualified. Max Hey now, I logged about 500 miles on a 44' custom built ferro-cement, pilot house ketch, on a delivery crew. Wasn't so bad. I wasn't impugning ferro-cement, rather just some of the "creations" that have been fashioned from it. I saw one beautiful f-c boat a few years back, but most have been so ugly that they had to sneak up on the ocean to get wet. Max Don't think I would ever trust one if I wasn't present during the molding process. A continuously wet monolithic and homogeneous mold operation is an absolute necessity and probably rarely occurs. However, if done right, I'm led to believe that they get stronger every year they are in the water. You have more faith in f-c than I. I'd never go offshore in one, despite knowing it was built properly and by a pro. I just don't think it's a reasonable building material, despite what some aficionados claim. One of the positively ugliest f-c boats was built by a retired physician near here. He put it in the water in an inland lake (it was 44'long !!) and finally rigged it several years later, only to have it disassemble itself the first time he sailed it. Apparently he knew more about medicine that f-c construction. :-) Max |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A friend of mine stopped over............. | Cruising | |||
Halifax Goes Dry | General | |||
Nice boat........ | General | |||
Near Deaths on the Lower Gauley | General | |||
Near Deaths on the Lower Gauley | Whitewater |