Based on the above, you are an idiot.
CWM

Really? That surprises me since I was using Democratic thought
processes. Anyway shrug.... I guess you've changed your mind about
dfending Kerry's comments too... the guy really did put his foot in it
huh?

Dak wrote:

Based on the above, you are an idiot.
CWM

Really? That surprises me since I was using Democratic thought
processes.

No, you were using what you *imagine* is Democratic thought processes,
but as you are unfamaliar with actual Democrats or actual thought, you
are way off base.

You know, if you were a little smarter, it wouldn't come as so much of a
surprise that people think you are an idiot.


Anyway shrug.... I guess you've changed your mind about
dfending Kerry's comments too... the guy really did put his foot in it
huh?

Are you from Wisconsin dairy country? 'Cause they're the only people
I've ever encountered who can milk something so thoroughly.

//Walt

Walt writes:

No, you were using what you *imagine* is Democratic thought
processes,
but as you are unfamaliar with actual Democrats or actual thought, you
are way off base.

I know a lot about hate. I know the argument you're making on Kerry's
bashing Bush with a statement that in no way looks like it could
possibley be is based on the hate that we should assume Dems feel for
Republicans.

You know, if you were a little smarter, it wouldn't come as so much
of a
surprise that people think you are an idiot.

A Dem called me an idiot because evidently he couldn't come up with
anything better. Really though, I don't mind too much, I mean if the
United States Military is full of uneducated people, I'm in damn good
company

Dak wrote:

I know a lot about hate. I know the argument you're making on Kerry's
bashing Bush with a statement that in no way looks like it could
possibley be is based on the hate that we should assume Dems feel for
Republicans.

Man, that's positively post-modern. Jaques Derrida would be proud.

I mean, I could't diagram that sentence even if you threatened me with
Vegamite.

//Walt

In article . com,
wrote:
This election really isnt about the individual running for election, it
is about the failed philosophy of the Dem lefties vs the attempts of
the Bush admin to do the difficult task of trying to spread democracy.
Sometimes you fail when trying to do the right thing, however, that is
better than the Dem tactic of doing nothing or doing the wrong thing.

Spreading democracy by invading a country that didn't have anything to
do with 9/11, but claiming that that country was involved, then
screwing up the occupation to the point of making the situation even
worse is not a good model. The Dem's "failed" policy had Saddam
contained, with no real threat to our country. The Dem's "failed"
policy in N. Korea, was something Colin Powell and Rice _endorced_ at
the beginning of the Bush Admin., which was then rejected by Bushco
because they believed that *anything* Clinton did was bad. Stupid is
as stupid does.




--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

Lol!!! Never said you'd like what I wrote Walt. Didn't expect you to.

Dave wrote:
Walt said:
Dak wrote:


I know the argument you're making on Kerry's
bashing Bush with a statement that in no way looks like it could
possibley be is based on the hate that we should assume Dems feel for
Republicans.

Man, that's positively post-modern. Jaques Derrida would be proud.

I mean, I could't diagram that sentence even if you threatened me with
Vegamite.

Your study of grammar stopped too early. Remove Walt's extraneous "is" in
his penultimate line, and try again. It's a complex sentence, but at least
grammatically correct with that change.

Fair enough. But if you're going to allow Dak to remove extraneous
state-of-being verbs, maybe one ought to allow Kerry to ex-post facto
insert the missing pronoun? i.e. "...you wind up getting US stuck in Iraq."

Or allow the substitution of "Dak" for "Walt" in your post, which is
obviously what you meant.

Which is to say that we all mis-speak from time to time; the fact that a
simple misstatement brings down the full fury of the wing-nut-o-sphere
indicates something about them, and it ain't charitable.

This little kurfuffle acts quite well as a screen to see if someone is
reasonable and thoughtful, or whether they just knee-jerk react to the
noise machine. Congratulations for passing, Dave. Respect is earned.

//Walt

Dave wrote:
On 3 Nov 2006 15:40:02 -0600, Dave said:

Remove Walt's extraneous

Should, of course, have said "Remove Dak's extraneous..."


ZOMFG!!! CALL OUT THE DOGS! DAVE HAS MISQUOTED ME!! HE OBVIOUSLY MEANT
THIS AS A SLUR ON THE TROOPS! I DEMAND AN APPOLOGY!!

(c:

//Walt

Dave would never insult the troops. He should apologize anyway, however, in
case someone out there thinks he did.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Walt" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:
On 3 Nov 2006 15:40:02 -0600, Dave said:

Remove Walt's extraneous

Should, of course, have said "Remove Dak's extraneous..."


ZOMFG!!! CALL OUT THE DOGS! DAVE HAS MISQUOTED ME!! HE OBVIOUSLY MEANT
THIS AS A SLUR ON THE TROOPS! I DEMAND AN APPOLOGY!!

(c:

//Walt

Capt. JG wrote:

Dave would never insult the troops. He should apologize anyway, however, in
case someone out there thinks he did.


I agree. Of course, if he does appologize, someone should come along
and give him a hard time for it. Especially if he doesn't actually
admit to insulting the troops, which he probably won't.

And if he *does* admit to insulting the troops, well, look out Nelly!


//Walt